PARR FAMILY STUDY
INDEX:
lu: F193.
The name of PARR is derived from the residence of the owners of the township of Parr, in the parish of Prescot, County Lancaster, England. {S19}.
Some historians have suggested that it was originally a corruption of the baptismal name of Pierre, the French form of Peter {S19}, but there seems to be no basis for this theory.
In ancient records the name appears in the various forms of PAR, PARE, (PARYE-S12)and PARRE, as well as in the now generally used spelling of Parr. {S19}. Other spellings of PAIR, PARE, PEAR, PARRISH, or even PARRY have been suggested, but so far do not seem to be related.
Early seated in the English Counties of Lancaster, Chester, Leicester, Northampton, Westmoreland, Devon, Salop, and Survey, as well as in the city and vicinity of London, the family belonged, in large part, to the landed gentry and nobility of Great Britain.{S19}.
The earliest definite records of the name in England include those of Henry de Par, who was living at Parr, in the County of Lancaster, as early as 1216; those of another Henry de Par, of the same place, in 1318; those of Richard de Par of Lancashire in 1338; those of Alan de Par of Lancashire during the reign of Edward III (circa 1327-1377); and those of Sir John de Parre who was living at Parr, County Lancaster about 1350. {S19}.
PARR COAT OF ARMS
Parr. Marquis of Northampton. Argent, two bars azure within a bordure engrailed sable.
An ancient coat of arms of the English family of Parr is described in heraldic terms as follows (Burke, Encyclopaedia of Heraldry. 1944):
ARMS. -- Argent, two bars azure, a bordure engrailed sable.
CREST. -- A female's head couped below the shoulders, habited azure, on her head a wreath of roses (alternately argent and gules).
Kempnall Hall (Kemporoughe, Kempnough) is in the township of WORSLEY, in the parish of Eccles, hundred of Salford, S. division of Lancashire, 7 miles (W. by N.) from Manchester, on the road to Leigh and Wigan.
Kendal Castle was in existence by 1184 when it passed by Marriage to Gilbert Fitz Reinfred, and it was he who constructed it in stone. After that the castle had several owners: 1215 taken by the Crown; given back to William de Lancaster, son of Gilbert; 1246, Peter de Brus; 1272, the Ros family; 1383, the Parr family; 1553 the Crown again, then back to the Parrs in 1559; 1571 back to the Crown. By this time it was falling down. Not until 1813 was any work carried out to prevent further collapse.
Cleworth Hall is near Manchester.
Cleworth Hall Colliery. (closed in 1961) in Tyldesley.
The Parish of Tyldesley in the County of Lancashire
A parochial district in the hundred of WEST DERBY, county palatine of LANCASTER, 2-1/2 miles (E.N.E.) from Leigh, containing 4,325 inhabitants. In 1827, the township of Tyldesley was erected into a district parish, as regards ecclesiastical affairs.
The living is a perpetual curacy, in the archdeaconry and diocese of Chester, endowed with £600 private benefaction, and £1600 royal bounty, and in the patronage of Lord Lilford.
The church, dedicated to St. George, was erected by the commissioners for promoting the building of additional churches, at an expense of more than £12,000, and will accommodate two thousand persons: it is a chaste and handsome structure, designed by Smirke, in the later style of English architecture, with a spire rising to the height of one hundred and fifty feet, and was consecrated in September 1825.
The site was presented by the late Thomas Johnson, Esq.; and the munificence of George Ormerod, Esq. has supplied the enclosure of the cemetery, a peal of six fine-toned bells, three beautiful painted windows, an organ, an elegant communion cloth, &c.; the communion plate was the gift of Mrs. Ormerod.
There are places of worship for those in the connexion of the late Countess of Huntingdon, and Wesleyan Methodists.
The freehold of the village belonged originally to the family of Tildesley; the present proprietor is George Ormerod, Esq.: about half a century ago, its population consisted of only three families; it is now estimated at about three thousand individuals, and is still increasing.
The Leeds and Liverpool canal, which extends also Manchester, passes within two miles of the place.
Cotton-spinning is extensively carried on, and affords employment to about one thousand persons; the remainder of the labouring classes are employed in weaving, in agriculture, and in the neighbouring collieries, which are very considerable: there are several cotton-mills, and one for the making of machinery.
A National school, erected in 1827, at an expense of £650, on a site given by George Ormerod, Esq., adjacent to the church, is a neat and substantial stone building of two stories, calculated to contain two hundred and fifty boys and as many girls: it is supported by subscription, and by small weekly payments from the scholars.
A subscription library was established in 1828.
Of the several antique mansions in the neighbourhood, there are considerable remains of Dam House, a very old brick building, with bay windows and gables; and, near it, the ruins of another, still more ancient: the site of Shackerley Hall is surrounded by a moat.
From: A Topographical Dictionary of England, by Samuel Lewis, Vol. IV, London, 1831, p.344.
Entered here 3 September 2004 by Lynn Ransom Burton.
Parr is a township "unpleasing to the eye, where the natural amenities have been replaced by everything unlovely that man could devise. Scarcely a green tree is to be seen, whilst collieries, chemical and iron works, huge banks and heaps of refuse, take the place of woods and fields and green meadows. Clouds of smoke and the fumes of chemical works hang continually over the district. On the south-east some waste mossland still remains, but altogether bereft of the vegetation which so often lends beauty to these undisturbed tracts".
The township has an area of 1,633 acres and is divided by the Sankey Brook into two nearly equal portions. It is bounded on the east by the Black Brook, while the moss on the south originally formed a physical division for Sutton, Parr, and Burtonwood. The ground rises gradually north and south of the bisecting brook, attaining nearly one hundred and fifty feet at the northern boundary. With the exception of a small area of lower mottled sandstone of the bunter series (new red sandstone) at Parr Moss, the coal measures are in evidence throughout the township.
The principal road is that from St. Helens north-eastwardly through Blackbrook to Ashton in Makerfield, the hamlet of Pocket Nook being situated next to St. Helens. From this point another road takes a winding course to Earlestown in the east; passing Parr Stocks, Broad Oak, and Havannah. To the south is Ashton's Green.
A branch of the London and North Western Company's system, from St. Helens to Wigan, has a station on the northern boundary, Carr Mill; and the Great Central's St. Helens and South Lancashire line passes east and west through the township. There are also a number of railways for the service of the collieries, as Parr is a colliery district, the whole township being undermined. The St. Helens Canal crosses, alongside the Sankey Brook.
A local board was formed in 1865, but dissolved in 1869 on the absorption of the township into St. Helens.
The manor formed part of the Master Forester's fee, being held with Whiston by the Gernets, and then by the Dacres, of whom it was held by Travers of Whiston. (fn. 3) Under the latter an inferior or mesne manor was formed, held by the Lathoms (fn. 4) and Stanleys in succession. {S15}.
The Established Church has two places of worship in Parr; St. Peter's, built in 1844, and Holy Trinity, Parr Mount, in 1863. The vicar of St. Helens presents to them. There is a Free Gospel chapel at Blackbrook. 68 Liverpool Cath. Ann. 1901, where the succession of the priests is given. Also Gillow, op. cit.
The Roman Catholic church of Blessed Mary Immaculate, Blackbrook, was consecrated in 1845. The mission is supposed to have been founded at the end of the seventeenth century, when Bryan Orrell, alias John Martin, an alumnus of Douay, 1686, came to serve at Blackbrook House, where, as stated above, his elder brother had settled. In 1754 a room to serve as a chapel was built, James Orrell, the owner, granting a 500 years' lease at a rent of 1s. (fn. 68) St. Vincent's, Derbyshire Hill, was opened in 1905.
Please note that since at certain times, like names were spelled in various manner, in this index like names are placed together, and not strictly alphabetical; such as Brian and Bryan, or Alan and Allen.
- Adam de HALSALL (?-?) [F103]
- Adam de PARR (c1280-?) [F96]
- Adam de PARR (c1280-?) [F166]
- Adam de PARR (c1300-?) [F161] Alice
- Adam de HALSALL (c1300-?) [F65]
- Agnes de PARR (?-?) [F78] Thomas de Glest
- Agnes PARR (?-?) [F31] daughter of Sir Thomas PARR [F23] and Maud GREENE
- Agnes Halsall de PARR (?-C1400) [F140] Nicholas de PARR [F139]
- Agnes de PARR (c1325-?) [F148] daughter of Henry de PARR [F109]
- Agnes PARRE (c1440-c1490) [F19] Thomas STRICKLAND of Syzergh
- Alan de PARR (?-?) [F79]
- Alan de PARR (?-?) [F101]
- Alan de PARR (?-?) [F74] Agnes
- Allen PARR (?-?) [F120] son of Thomas PARR [F115] and Mary
- Alan de PARR (?-?) [F98] son of Simon de PARR [F97]
- Alan de HALSALL of PARR (c1250-c1301) [F53] son of Richard de HALSALL [F52] and Denise
- Alan de PARR (c1300-c1367) [F62] son of Richard de PARR [F61]
- Alan de PAR (c1327-c1377) [F182] Of Lancashire during the reign of Edward III
- Allen PARR (c1804-?) [F?] (miss) Scales
- Alexander PARR (1840-?) [F129] Mathilda Letitia Richards
- Alice PARR (?-?) [F37] md probably Hindley
- Alice de PARR (?-?) [F114] dau. of Henry de PARR [F113]
- Alice de PARR (c1325-?) [F147] daughter of Henry de PARR [F109]
- Ann PARRE (?-?) [F17] daughter of Thomas PARRE [F12] and Alice TUNSTALL
- Anne PARR (c1480-?) [F22] Thomas CHEYNE of Irthlinghorough, Northamptonshire
- Anne PARR (c1505-?) (1) John DIGBY of Ketilby (2) Henry BROOKE
- Anne PARR (1514-1551) [F32] William HERBERT
- Bartholomew PARR (1713-1800) [F163] (1) ?. He married (2) Johana Burgess
- Bartholomew PARR (1750-1810) [F168] son of Bartholomew Parr [F163] and Johana Burgess
- Brian PARRE (?-?) [F41] son of John Parre [F40] and Elizabeth
- Bryan PARR (c1450-1528) [F88] Elizabeth SHAKERLEY
- Bridges PARR (c1761-c1839) [F117] Penelope Howze
- Catherine PARR (c1512-1548) [F33] (1) Edward de BURGH (2) John NEVILL (3) Henry VIII, King of Eng. (4) Thomas SEYMOUR
- Charlotte PARR (c1814-?) [F?] William Scales
- Claiborn PARR (c1766-1830) [F116] Martha Ivey
- (daughter) PARR (?-?) [F132] daughter of Thomas PARR [F128] and Mary Ann STEELE
- (daughter) PARR (c1790-c1850) [F121] David Nicholas
- Dorothy PARRE (c1478-?) [F7] William GREGORY
- Edward PARR (1861-?) [F125] Selina CORBY
- Eleanor PARRE (?-?) [F21] Sir Henry AGARD
- Elizabeth PARRE (?-?) [F18] Christopher MORESBY of Moresby
- Elizabeth PARR (c1499-c1531) [F26] Nicholas WOODHULL
- Elizabeth PARR (1797-c1849) [F?] Thomas Nance
- Ellen de PARR (?-?) [F84] daughter of Henry de PARR [F83]
- Elnathan PARR (c1570-c1632) [F169] divine, was educated at Eton school
- Geoffrey de PARR (c1200-?) [F59] son of Richard de PARR [F64]
- Geoffrey de PARRE (?-?) [F49] son of Richard de PARRE [F2] and Ellen de WORSLEY
- George PARR (1826-1891) [F170] cricketer, unmarried
- Gilbert de HALSALL (c1200-c1300) [F60]
- Gilbert de PARR (?-?) [F102] son of Alan de PARR [F101?]
- Grace de PARR (?-?) [F142] Henry ECCLESTON
- Henry de PARR (?-?) [F83]
- Henry de PARR (?-?) [F113] son of Roger de PARR [F112]
- Henry de PARR (?-?) [F109] Son of Robert de PARR [F110]
- Henry PARR (?-?) [F85] possibly the son of John de PARR [F81] and Ellen de PARR [F84]
- Henry de PARRE (?-?) [F46] son of Richard de PARRE [F2] and Ellen de WORSLEY
- Henry PARR (?-?) [F137] son of Lawrence PARR [F136]
- Henry de PAR (c1190-?) [F178] living at Parr, Lancaster
- Henry de PARR (?-c1300) [F108]
- Henry de PARR (c1220-?) [F107] son of Lawrence de PARR [F106]
- Henry de PARR (c1250-?) [F54]
- Henry de PARR (c1260-c1332) [F105] son of Henry de PARR [F108]
- Henry de PARR (c1300-?) [F55] father of Robert [F56]
- Henry de PAR (C1300-?) [F180] Of Parr manor, in 1318
- Henry HALSALL of PARR (c1400-c1480) [F86] Emma
- Hugh de PARRE (?-?) [F45] son of Richard de PARRE [F2] and Ellen de WORSLEY
- Hugh PARRE (c1452-) [F6] (1) Constance TILDESLEY (2) Isabel DYCHEFIELD
- Hugh PARR (c1600-?) [F35]
- James PARR (c1796-?) [F?] Nancy
- James PARR (?-?) [F133] son of Thomas PARR [F128] and Mary Ann STEELE
- Jesse PARR (c1802-?) [F?] Nancy Scales
- Joan de PARR (c1325-?) [F149] daughter of Henry de PARR [F109]
- John PARR (?-?) [F185] son of John PARR [F38] and Ellen RADCLIFFE. John died without issue
- John de PARR (?-?) [F159]
- John de PARR (?-?) [F156] son of John de PARR [F153]
- John de PARR (?-?) [F144] possible son of Robert de PARR [F110]
- John PARR, Jr (?-?) [F143] son of Richard PARR [F111], and brother of John PARR [F82]
- John PARR (?-?) [F192] Of Cheshire; son of Thomas PARR [F191]
- John de PARR (?-?) [F81] Ellen
- John de PARRE (?-?) [F48] son of Richard de PARRE [F2] and Ellen de WORSLEY
- John PARR (?-?) [F131] son of Thomas PARR [F128] and Mary Ann STEELE
- John PARR (?-?) [F9] Matilda LEYBURNE
- John PARRE (?-?) [F38] Ellena Radcliffe
- John de PARR (?-?) [F57]
- John PARRE (?-?) [F40] Elizabeth
- John PARR (?-?) [F36] son of Hugh PARR [F35]
- John de PARR (c1280-?) [F70] {S15}.
- John de PARR (c1300-?) [F160] perhaps the son of Henry de Parr of 1328
- John de PARR (c1325-c1390) [F82] son of Richard de PARR [F111]
- John PARR, Jr (c1325-c1376) [F143] son of Richard PARR [F111], and brother of John PARR [F82]
- John PARR (c1355-c1408) [F11] Agnes CROPHULL (Crophill)
- John PARRE (c1400-c1475) [F14] (miss) YONGE
- John PARR (?-1518) [F135] Yeoman farmer of Glyn by Winnington, Shropshire
- John HALLSALL of PARR (c1450-c1503) [F87] Elizabeth
- John PARR (c1450-?) [F93] He lived in Parr at the same time as John HALSALL of PARR [F87]
- John PARR (?-1504) [F25] Constance VERE
- John de PARR (c1450-c1512) [F153] Constance
- John de PARR (?-1530) [F141] Katherine
- John PARR (c1550-?) [F164]
- John PARR (c1633-c1716) [F171] dissenting minister, born about 1633, was doubtless related to Dr. Parr, bishop of Man
- John PARR (c1766-c1827) [F118] Elizabeth Hobbs
- John PARR (c1794-c1860) [F?] (1) Malinda (2) Mary
- John PARR (1857-?) [F124] (Sarah ?)
- Katherine PARR (c1550-?) [F95] Peter Byrom
- Lawrence de PARR (?-?) [F106]
- Lawrence PARR (?-?) [F136]
- Lucy de PARR (?-?) [F138] Henry de BYROM
- Margaret PARRE (?-?) [F16] Thomas RADCLYFFE of Derwentwater
- Margaret de PARR (?-c1420) [F158] William de IRELAND
- Margaret de PARRE (?-?) [F51] daughter of (unknown) de PARRE [F50]
- Mary PARR (c1501-?) [F27] Sir Thomas TRESHAM of Rushton
- Mary PARR (c1809-c1892) [F?] Joel Ivey Adams
- Mary PARR (1861-?) [F126] daughter of William PARR [F122] and Harriett WRIGHT
- Maud PARRE (?-?) [F20] Humphrey DACRE
- Maud (Madgalen) PARR (c1510-c1580) [F29] Ralph LANE
- Nathaniel PARR (1730-1769) [F173] either father or elder brother of Remigius PARR [F172]
- Nicholas de PARR (C1350-C1415) [F139] (1) Agnes Halsall de PARR [F140] (2) Katherine Benetson
- Oliver PARRE (?-?) [F183] son of Richard PARRE [F5]
- Oliver PARR (?-?) [F184] son of Hugh PARRE [F6] and Constance TYLDESLEY
- Oliver de PARRE (?-?) [F3] Emme Tuthill
- Ralph PARR (c1450-?) [F179] son of Thurston PARR [F154]
- Randolph PARR (?-?) [F190] son of Richard PARR [F187]
- Rebecca PARR (c1799-c1850) [F?] Isham/Isom Vaughn
- Remigius PARR (c1723-1747) [F172] engraver, is stated to have been born at Rochester in Kent in 1723
- Reynold de PARR (?-?) [F157] son of John de PARR [F153]
- Richard de PARR (?-?) [F145] Margery
- Richard de PARR (?-?) [F77] brother of John de PARR [F81]
- Richard de PARRE (?-?) [F2] Ellen de Worsley
- Richard PARRE (?-?) [F4] Emme HULTON
- Richard PARRE (?-?) [F5] Elizabeth Travers
- Richard PARRE (?-?) [F8]
- Richard PARRE (?-?) [F42]
- Richard de PARR (?-?) [F100] son of Richard de PARR [F99]
- Richard de HALSALL (?-?) [F52] Denise
- Richard de PARRE (?-?) [F47] son of Richard de PARRE [F2] and Ellen de WORSLEY
- Richard de PARR (c1250-?) [F73]
- Richard de PARR (c1250-c1335) [F61] son of ALAN de HALSALL of PARR [F53]
- Richard de PARR (c1290-c1351) [F111] Ellen TYLDESLEY
- Richard de PAR (c1300-?) [F181] Of Lancashire, in 1338
- Robert de PARR (c1325-?) [F146] Alice
- Richard PARR (?-?) [F187] son of John PARR [F38] and Ellen RADCLIFFE
- Richard de PARR (?-c1350) [F99] son of Alan de PARR [F98]
- Richard de HALSALL (of PARR?) (c1280-?) [F104] son of Adam de HALSALL [F103]
- Richard de PARR (?-?) [F64] son of Geoffrey de PARR [F59]
- Richard de HALSALL (c1280-?) [F66] Cecily
- Richard de PARR (c1300-?) [F67] son of Richard de HALSALL [F52]
- Richard de PARR (c1300-?) [F76] son of Richard de PARR [F73]
- Richard de PARR (c1320-?) [F72] Son of Richard de PARR [F61]
- Richard HALSALL of PARR (c1450-?) [F92] probable son of Henry HALSALL of PARR [F86]
- Richard PARR (c1592-1644) [F174] bishop of Sodor and Man
- Richard PARR (1617-?) [F175] son of Richard PARR [F?]
- Robert de PARR (?-?) [F151] son of Robert de PARR [F146]
- Robert PARR (?-?) [F189] (1) Elizabeth ROGERS (2) Eleanor LANGTON
- Robert de PARR (?-?) [F75] Cecily
- Robert PARR (?-?) [F94] son of John PARR [F93]
- Robert de HALSALL (?-?) [F68] son of Adam de HALSALL [F65]
- Robert de PARR (?-?) [F63] son of Alan de PARR [F62]
- Robert de PARR (c1260-c1330) [F69] Alice
- Robert de PARR (c1290-c1325) [F110] son of Henry de PARR [F105]
- Robert de PARR (c1300-?) [F56] son of Henry de PARR [F55]
- Robert de PARR (c1300-?) [F162] son of Adam de PARR [F166]
- Robert de PARR (c1350-?) [F80] son of Alan de PARR [F79]
- Robert de PARR of Shaw (c1350-c1410) [F150] Alice
- Robert de PARR (c1400-c1482) [F152] Elizabeth
- Robert de PARR (c1460-?) [F155] Grace
- Roger de PARR (?-?) [F112]
- Sally PARR (c1812-?) [F?] William Motte
- Samuel PARR (?-?) [F177] Anne
- Samuel PARR (1747-1825) [F176] son of Samuel PARR [F177] and Anne
- Sidney PARR (?-?) [F127] son of John PARR [F124] and (Sarah?)
- Simon de PARR (c1280-?) [F97]
- Thomas PARR (?-?) [F186] (1) Margery. He married (2) ?
- Thomas PARR (?-?) [F191] son of Randolph PARR [F190]
- Thomas PARR (?-?) [F191] Of Cheshire; son of Thomas PARR [F191]
- Thomas PARR (?-?) [F89] son of Bryan PARR [F88]
- Thomas HALSALL of PARR (?-?) [F91] son of Henry HALSALL of PARR [F86]
- Thomas PARR (?-?) [F34] son of Sir Thomas PARR [F23] and Maud GREENE
- Thomas PARR (?-?) [F128] Mary Ann Steele
- Thomas PARR (?-?) [F130] son of Thomas PARR [F128] and Mary Ann STEELE
- Thomas PARRE (?-c1472) [F15] son of Thomas PARRE [F12] and Alice TUNSTALL
- Thomas PARRE (c1400-?) [F43]
- Thomas PARR (c1483-1518) [F23] Maud (Matilda) GREENE
- Thomas PARR (1483-1635) [F134] (1) Jane TAYLOR (2) Katharine MILTON (3) Jane Floyd (Flood), widow of Anthony ADDA
- Thomas PARRE (c1380-1464) [F12] Alice TUNSTALL
- Thomas PARR (c1730-1797) [F115] Mary
- Thomas PARR (c1770-1849) [F119] Dorcas
- Thomas PARR (c1806-?) [F?] son of Claiborn PARR [F116] and Martha Ivey
- Thurston PARR (?-?) [F154]
- Thurstan PARR (c1500-?) [F1] Margaret RADCLIFFE
- Thurston PARR (c1570-?) [F165] son of John PARR [F164]
- (UNKNOWN) PARR (c1300-?) [F39]
- (Unknown) de PARRE (?-?) [F50] father of Richard de PARRE [F2] and Margaret de PARRE [F51]
- William PARR (?-?) [F188] Elizabeth BARROW
- William de PARRE (?-?) [F44] son of Richard de PARRE [F2] and Ellen de WORSLEY
- William de PARR (c1300-?) [F58]
- William de PARR (c1310-?) [F71] son of John de Parr
- William PARR (c1320-1405) [F10] Elizabeth ROS
- William PARRE (1434-c1484) [F13] (1) Joan TRUSBET (2) Elizabeth FITZHUGH
- William PARR (c1473-1546) [F24] Mary SALISBURY
- William PARR (c1512-1571)[F30] (1) Anne BOURCHIER (2) Elizabeth BROOKE (3) Helen SUAVENBURGH
- William PARR (c1530-c1600) [F90] Katherine Eccleston
- William PARR (1807-1889) [F122] Harriett WRIGHT
- William PARR (1854-?) [F123] Sarah JACKSON
*~*~*~*~*~*~*
- F1. Thurstan PARR. Born about (1475-S25)(1500), of Kempnough (Kempenhough-S25)(Kempnall) and Cleworth, Lancashire, England; son of Hugh PARRE [F6] and Constance TYLDESLEY. He married Margaret RADCLIFFE, daughter of John Radcliffe and Elizabeth Brereton, about 1521 at Kempnouth, Lancashire, England. Margaret was born about 1503 and died after 1550. CHILDREN: John PARR [F185]. {S1,S19,S25}.
- F2. Richard de PARRE. Born about 1335, (Of Workesley-S14) and of (Kemporoughe-S19)(Kempenhough-S25)(Kempnall-S24); son of (unknown) de PARRE [F50]. Living at Kempnall about 1420. Brother of Margaret de PARRE [F51]. He married Ellen (Helene-S19) de WORSLEY, daughter of Richard de Worsley (Worceley-S19) of Kempnough (Kempnall-S24).
At Lancaster, on Friday in the first week of Lent, 9 Henry IV. [9 March 1408], before William Gascoigne and John Cokayne, justices.{S14}.
Between John del Fere and Nicholas de Workesley, plaintiffs, and Richard de Parr, of Workesley, and Ellen, his wife, deforciants of 4 messuages, 40 acres of land, 3 acres of meadow, and 3 acres of pasture with the appurtenances in Worseley. (fn. 10).{S14}.
Richard and Ellen acknowledged the tenements to be the right of John and Nicholas, who granted the same to Richard and Ellen, to hold of the chief lords of that fee for the life of Richard and Ellen, after their decease to remain to Oliver, son of the said Richard and Ellen, and the heirs male of his body, in default to remain to William, brother of the said Oliver, and his heirs male, in default to remain to Hugh, brother of the said William, and his heirs male, in default to remain to Henry, brother of the same Hugh, and his heirs male, in default to remain to Richard, brother of the same Henry, and his heirs male, in default to remain to John, brother of the same Richard, and his heirs male, in default to remain to Geoffrey, brother of the same John, and his heirs male, in default to remain to Robert, brother of the same Geoffrey, and his heirs male, in default to remain to the heirs male issuing of the bodies of the same Richard de Parr and Ellen, in default to remain to Margaret, sister of the same Robert, and her heirs male, in default to remain to the right heirs of the said Ellen for ever.{S14}.
Footnote: Towneley's MSS., vol. DD., penes W. Farrer, no. 953. The tenements probably represented the estate of Kempnall, or Kempnough, in Worsley. From: 'Lancashire Fines: Henry IV', Final Concords for Lancashire, Part 3: 1377-1509 (1905), pp. 60-70. URL: http://www.british-history.ac.uk/report.asp?compid=52566&strquery=Parr. Date accessed: 08 June 2007.{S14}.
CHILDLREN: Oliver de PARRE [F3], William de PARRE [F44], Hugh de PARRE [F45], Henry de PARRE [F46], Richard de PARRE [F47], John de PARRE [F48], Geoffrey de PARRE [F49]. {S2,S14,S19,S25,F27}.
- F3. Oliver de PARRE. (Olyver-S19,S25). Born about 1360 in Kempenhough, Lancashire, England; son of Richard de PARRE [F2] and Ellen de WORSLEY. He married Emme TUTHILL, daughter of William Tuthill of Cleworth. CHILDREN: Richard PARRE. [F4]. {S2,S14,S19,S24,S25,F27}.
- F4. Richard PARRE. Born about 1390, of Kempnough (Kempnall-S24) and Cleworth, Lancashire, England; son of Oliver de PARRE [F3] and Emme TUTHILL. He married Emme HULTON, daughter of Roger Hulton of Hulton and Katherine Harrington (daughter of Sir James Harrington of Wolfedge). CHILDREN: Richard PARRE [F5]. {S2,S19,S24,S25,F27}.
- F5. Richard PARRE. Born about 1422, of Kempnough (Kempnall-S24) and Cleworth, Lancashire, England; son of Richard PARRE [F4] and Emme HULTON. He married Elizabeth TRAVERS, daughter of John Travers of Rudgate. Elizabeth was born about 1426. CHILDREN: Hugh PARRE [F6], Oliver PARRE [F]. {S2,S19,S24,S25,F27}.
- F6. Hugh PARRE. Born about 1452; of Kempnough and Cleworth, Lancashire, England; son of Richard PARRE [F5] and Elizabeth TRAVERS. He married (1) Constance TILDESLEY (Tyldesley-S19), daughter of Thomas Tildesley of Wardley. Constance was born about 1454. He married (2) Isabel DYCHEFIELD. Isabel was born about 1456. CHILDREN: Dorothy PARRE [F7], Thurston PARR [F1], Oliver PARR [F184]. {S2,S4,S24,F25,F27}.
- F7. Dorothy PARRE. Born about 1478; of Kempenhough (Kempnall), Lancashire, England; daughter of Hugh PARRE [F6] and Constance TILDESLEY (De Tyldesley-S11) or daughter of (Isabel Dychefield-S4,S24). She is often said to be the daughter of Richard PARRE [F8]. She married William GREGORY (about 1489)(about 1495)(about 1499) in West Derby, County Lancaster, England. William was born about 1470; and resided at Highhurst, Tyldesley with Shakerly, Leigh in Lancashire, England. CHILDREN: Hugh Gregory, John Gregory. {S2,S3,S4,S24,S25,F27}.
- F8. Richard PARRE. Born about 1452 in Kempnall, Lancashire, England. CHILDREN: Dorothy PARRE [F7]. {S3,S25}.
- F9. Sir John PARR (de PARRE-S19). Lord of Parr. Of Parr manor, Lancaster, England. Living at Parr about 1350. He married Matilda LEYBURNE, daughter of Sir Richard de Leyborne. CHILDREN: William PARR [F10]. {S5,S6,S19}.
- F10. Sir William de PARR. (PARRE). Knight (Marquess) of Parr & Kendal. Born (about 1320)(about 1350-S21) at Kendal Castle, Wes., England; son of Sir John PARR [F9] and Matilda LEYBURNE. The next in possession of the moitey of Parr, after Richard de PARR [F100]. He apparently held an eighth part of the vill about 1370, but in the Inquisition of Thomas de Lathom, on the division of the waste in 1377, this eighth part is not recognized at all. This is probably because he was convicted of murder in Lancashire, having killed Robert Haghe in 1369. In 1371 he secured a pardon for his crime in order to join the retinue of John of Gaunt, Duke of Lancaster, and to fight for the duke on the continent. So well did he serve his master that he was allowed to marry Elizabeth, heiress of He married Elizabeth (ROS)(de ROOS-S20)(ROSS-S19), daughter of John de Ros, and granddaughter and heiress of Sir Thomas de Ros, baron of Kendal, (sometime between 1380 and 1382-S?)(in1383-S20). The de Roos family of Kendal was a junior branch of the de Rooses of Hamlake. Through his marriage he acquired Kendal Castle and one-fourth part of the barony of Kendal, which continued in the family till after the death of William Parr, Marquis of Northampton, when the Marquis's widow surrendered it to Queen Elizabeth I. It was known as 'The Marquis Fee.' This branch of the family resided at Kendal. Sir William Parr had served as soldier, treaty negotiator, ambassador and king's councillor, first to the duke of Lancaster and then to his son, Henry IV. His marriage enabled Parr to move from a small patrimony in Lancashire to his wife's extensive inheritance in Westmorland and found the fortunes of the Parr family of Kendal.
From S21: THE object of this study is to trace the causes of the rise and fall in family fortunes as exemplified by that of the Parrs of Kendal Castle through a period of great political upheaval and transition. Three main factors affected the social and economic status of families at this time. The first, that of patronage, demonstrates how closely the Parr fortunes were affected by those of the patron on whose vessel they were privileged to embark upon the perilous political seas of the 14TH and 15TH centuries. Marriage alliances, too, were of supreme importance, carrying the family to its zenith when Katherine Parr became the consort of Henry VIII, and to tis nadir through the failure of William, her brother, to leave legitimate heirs. The third factor was the ability of the head of the house to avail himself of those opportunities for advancement offered in his day and age, and to avoid the dangers inherent in the unstable political situation, learning when necessary on both sides of the stairs to get up, as the earl of Pembroke, husband of Ann Parr, unblushingly confessed to doing. William de Parr, founder of the Westmorland branch of that name, pursued a military career which, in the 14TH century was as good a road as that of the Church or Law for an enterprising man to follow in search of success. Accounts of his origin are confused and obscure. He was born about 1350, and one authority states he was the son of Sir John de Parr of Parr in the parish of Prescot, Lancashire, his mother being Matilda, daughter of Sir Richard Leyburne.3
An inquisition of 1385 on the possession of Thomas de Lathom states he was seised of "the homage and service of Sir John de Parr, of Robert, son of Henry de Parr and of William, who held their tenements in Parr by knight's service and by rendering 6s. 3d. yearly. Also of the service of Robert, son of Alan Parr, who held of him tenements in socage by rendering yearly 3s. 9d."4
William who held an eighth part of the vill [sic] of Parr, seems to have inherited it from Richard, son of another Richard who died about 1350. William was in possession about 1370.5 A crime opens his recorded career. With a Roger Haukese6 he was accused of killing Robert Haghe or Hawe some time before 1 March 1369.7 But Sir Walter Huet, veteran of the Hundred Years' War, and one of the heroes of Froissart, came to Parr's aid. The renewal of hostilities with France in 1369, and the commissioning of John of Gaunt to take out a strong force to Gascony, gaining for Parr—as well as for others—through Huet's petitions in May 1370, a pardon
"for good service to be rendered by William de Par in the company of the said Walter in parts beyond the sea, to William of the King's suit for the death of Roger Hawe, alias Haghe . . . whereof he is indicted or appealed of any consequent outlawry."8
From 1 April to 1 June, however, Huet and his men were kept in London
"awaiting payment of their wages and the pleasure of the Lord King and his Council."9
Small wonder that many recruits grew tired and decamped, among them "two chivalers and twenty one men (named) who were to have gone beyond seas in the company of Walter Huet but have not gone, as the said Walter has certified."10
These had their pardons revoked. By some mischance, as it transpired later, Parr seems to have been included by those in authority among these deserters.
Huet's contingent, as part of Gaunt's great fleet, sailed from Plymouth to Gascony,11 Their arrival in Bordeaux was sadly damped by news of the fall of Limoges. It is unlikely that William was at the seige and sack of the city, for Froissart, who always appears to include Huet's name whenever he took part in an engagement, does not mention him as being at Limoges, but states that Huet and his company had been sent to strengthen and hold the frontiers of Poitou, where he commanded a contingent in the attack on the fortress of Moncontours;12 here therefore, presumable, Parr first saw action in France.
Six months or so later, when Lancaster returned to England, William accompanied him. By this time he was so far advanced in the duke's favour that he could beg him to petition the king, his father, on his behalf, for it appears that, in spite of the pardon Huet had gained for Parr in May 1370, he was still accounted an outlaw and it was necessary to prove that he had taken part in the Gascon campaign. Accordingly, in 1371, Lancaster himself petitioned Edward III that William might be pardoned, certifying and making known to the king that
"he (William) was occupied in the war and service of our lord and father aforesaid in our company and that of the said Sir Walter from the time of our passage towards the said parts of Guienne until our return to England."13
So that, instead of re-entering England as a fugitive from justice, Parr returned under the patronage and protection of the great Lancaster himself, for although no bond of contract between the duke and him was survived, yet some short while later William was established as one of the regular members of the Lancastrain retinue.14
The disastrous course of the French war soon drew Gaunt back into the front line and with him, presumably, went William since he, in company with many others, received the sum of £4. 11s. 4d. from the Lancastrian exchequer before March 1372 in part payment of £9. 11s. 4d. due to him as wages and fees of war.15
Edward III had determined to save Thouars, which was being sorely pressed. Orders for ships to be collected in the harbours of Portsmouth and Sandwich had been sent out on 6 and 7 February 1372,16 but the fleet did not sail until the end of August when fierce gales prevented it from making headway. Meanwhile Thouars was lost, and Gaunt and his army returned ignominiously home.
Parr now seems to have returned to his Lancastrian manor, for in November 1372 Gaunt sent an order from Hertford to his
"parker de Tokstat et Crokstat . . . to deliver to William Par a buck from one of the said parks."17
By the spring of 1373 William received from the duke letters of protection to go on the king's service on the next voyage in Gaunt's company;18 he was presumably, therefore, among the bands of fighting men who passed through the towns and villages of the West Country on their way to Plymouth to join Lancaster. By 4 August the great march from Calais towards the south of France had begun, as disastrous a campaign for invader as ever was waged. To Parr it brought what must surely have been a personal tragedy.
At Ouchy, Sir Walter Huet and his men were passing the night. Huet had already gone to his lodging to rest and taken off his armour. "Then, suddenly, one hundred and twenty French men-at-arms . . . commanded by Jean de Vienne, surprised at dawn the outposts of the English army and Walter Huet, one of the most illustrious veterans of the army was killed while trying—when only half armed—to repulse a completely unexpected attack . . . the English, deeply affected by the loss of one of their most valiant knights then began the march towards Rheims."19
Yet before that gruelling march in mid-winter was ended, Parr and his comrades may well have envied Huet his earlier death, for out of 15,000 picked men, all originally mounted, only 8,000, and half of these unmounted, passed finally through the gates of Bordeaux.20
Parr returned home with his patron. From Hertford where Gaunt retired to shun publicity and the animosity with which he was now widely regarded, he directed his clerk of the Great Wardrobe to make a settlement with his "well loved esquire, William de Par," who had not been paid the five marks of his annuity for the term of St. Michael 1373, nor the other five marks for the following Easter term owed to him by the duchy of Lancaster.21
During his retirement the direction of the duke's ambition changed. As husband of the heiress of Castile, Gaunt determined to claim and conquer this country with which Parr was to be connected at intervals until practically the end of his life. Gaunt's first task was to make peace with France and from the evidence it seems that Parr accompanied his patron to Bruges to parley for the truce which was arranged on 27 June, for on 24 July, immediately on his return to England, the duke sent to his chief forester at Needwood orders to deliver to William another fat buck from the chace;22 an acceptable reward for services rendered, presumably, in Bruges.
From 1375 to June 1378 there is a gap in our evidence regarding Parr, but in the spring of 1378 Lancaster was given command of a naval force to put an end to French aggression, and on 1 June Parr was granted a letter of attorney because he was going to Brittany with the duke.23 Unfortunately the attack on St. Malo was a fiasco, largely owing to Arundel's incompetence,24 and once again Parr returned to England under the shadow of his patron's failure. Nevertheless, Parr's personal influence continues to increase through the years as is shown by the fact that at least four felons appealed to him to gain them pardons for their crimes.25
As one of Gaunt's personal attendants, it seems likely that parr would accompany him to Scotland in 1380 to treat with the Scots, for warrants were sent out from Leicester on 26 August to the receivers of Lancaster and York to call out the knights and esquires of the duke's retinue to meet him at Newcastle upon Tyne, arrayed for war.26
But it was around the year 1382 that Parr took his second great step forward along the road of advancement. He was probably now in his early thirties, and his service with Lancaster had brought him not only experience in war but enhanced social prestige: he must also have benefited immeasurably from his contact with the brilliant courts of Bordeaux and the art filled treasurehouse of the Savoy Palace in London, to which the duke's presence attracted many of the leading figures in the political and cultural life of Europe; here Parr continued his vicarious lessons in diplomacy, talked, presumably, with Chaucer and Froissart, listened to the songs and music of Gaunt's well-paid minstrels and absorbed willy-nilly some at least of the European culture of the 14TH century.
Nevertheless, Parr was still only a paid mercenary, possessed of an insignificant estate worth but a mere 15d. per annum in rent. 27 his social standing and influence dependent in the main on his retention of his great patron's favour. Then he married,28 and at once, through his wife the way was opened for his future acquisition of independence and security, of a Norman stronghold in the north—small, it is true, but yet a castle with wide acres—of manors, mills and rents with the added social prestige which went with their possession. His bride was Elizabeth de Ros, daughter of John de Ros (died 1358)29 and heiress to her grandfather, Sir Thomas de Ros of Kendal Castle, Westmorland. She was 17 years and upwards in 1382.30
Elizabeth was a royal Scottish descent, since her ancestor Robert, Lord Roos of Helmsley had married Isabel, illegitimate daughter of William of Lion of Scotland.31 Robert de Ros of Werk, a younger grandson of Robert and Isabel, married Margaret de Brus, heiress to Kendal Castle.32 Sir Thomas de Ros was the grandson of this marriage.
Parr's marriage was possibly arranged through Peter de Ros, the bride's uncle who had become one of Gaunt's retainers in 1382.33 In any case, Parr must have been well known to Sir Thomas—a firebrand of a man and a typical Borderer—as Ros had served in the earl of Arundel's retinue under Lancaster, in 1378.34 A son, named John, was born to William and Elizabeth during or before 1382.35
There is no evidence to show whether William took part in Lancaster's campaign against the Scots in 1384 or in King Richard's expedition during the summer of the following year, but by 1386 Parr was being drawn into the orbit of his patron's ambition, centering on Castile, for we find that, on 12 January: "William de Par, going on the King's service to Portugal, appoints Hugh de Ines and Richard de Assheton as his attornies."
So, once more, in the spring of 1386, Parr rode along the London-Plymouth highway in attendance upon the duke and his Spanish "Queen." His view of the future must have been satisfactory for, in the event of his patron winning the throne of Castile, the rewards given to his closest followers were likely to be kingly.
Then followed the delay in Devon while ships were being collected, the relief of Brest, the surrender of Corunna and St. James de Compostella, capital of Galicia, where Parr presumably witnessed the arrival of the Castilian embassy with a secret offer of marriage for Lancaster's daughter Katherine with the heir of Castile. That he survived the disastrous campaign which followed, when English knights, esquires and archers died off in hundreds from plague and dysentry, speaks well for the strength of his constitution. It was probably to raise another army for the duke that Parr returned to England in the summer of 1387. By the end of 1388 William had gained the confidence of King Richard II himself and was acting as his agent in trying to secure the early return of Gaunt from Aquitaine to redress the balance of power which the Lords Appellant had weighted so heavily against the king.
It was through Parr's management of the affairs entrusted to him at this juncture that Lancaster seems to have become convinced of his abilities. Richard had already made one attempt to send envoys to Aquitaine, but this had been frustrated, possibly by Arundel, who held the post of High Admiral. Now using Parr as his agent, the king sent to
Richard earl of Arundel, the King's admiral or his lieutenant, the mayors and bailiffs of Plymouth and Dartmouth, and the keepers of the passages in the ports of Fowey and Barnstaple, strict order as they love the king and his honour, and would escape his wrath, with all speed to provide from the king's money another ship and barge furnished with seamen and gear and deliver them to William Parre for the voyage of certain envoys whom the king purposes to send to John Duke of Lancaster, to declare business which concerns the king and his commonweal [sic], that by their default the business remain not undone which the king would impute to their neglect; as lately, by the advice and assent of the Council, a great ship and barge were arrested and suddenly departed for foreign parts at the will of the owners and possessors for their advantage, without advising the king, as his highness is informed. Dated Windsor, 4 December 1388.37
Nearly a year passed before the duke landed at Plymouth. The day following, 20 November, he granted by letters patent
"to William de Par, his bachelor, on his surrender of earlier letters patent—granting him 50 marks a year for life from the issues of the duchy of Lancaster—£50 a year therefrom.:38
The bestowal of this grant and the fact that Parr was now a knight bachelor obviously betokens the performance of some outstanding service on his part. Possibly he accompanied the freightship sent out by the king in 1389 to bring back his uncle Gaunt from Aquitaine.39 Parr may then have given his patron first hand information regarding the political situation in England, urging upon him the desirability of leaving affairs which, as its governor, had kept the duke in the French province, to deal with the serious state of emergency in England which Parr must have known would continue as long as Gloucester's lust for power remained unchecked, and the divided state of the Council continued to threaten the stability and peace of the realm.
The next seven years which marked for England and Lancaster a period and prosperity, also brought further honours and wealth to Parr. In 1390 Sir Thomas de Ros—Lady Elizabeth Parr's grandfather—ended his long and turbulent life40 and on 23 January 1391 Sir William and his wife were granted
"full seisin of all the lands which Thomas held of the king in chief in fee tail . . . on the day of his death, as the king has taken homage and fealty due from William by reason of his having issue by Elizabeth."41
Parr did not, however, retire to his northern fortress in Westmorland, for Lancaster went to Amiens to negotiate a truce with Charles of France, taking a magnificent retinue of 1,000 horsemen. Stately processions, royal banquets and tournaments followed fast upon each other, and the grant made by the duke to Sir William and his wife of an estate in Cornwall,
"of the land and lordship of Ayran in the parish of St. Medart, Ruyan, forfeited by the lord of Budos, 26 October 1392", 42
points to a desire on the part of the duke to contribute towards the heavy expenses incurred by Parr as his knight bachelor during the recent diplomatic mission.
But a higher honour was pending. The duke decided to make sure of the experience in diplomacy which at least two members of his suite had gained during their years of service with him in foreign courts. Sir William Parr with Sir Walter Blount and Henry Bowet, archdeacon of Lincoln were appointed in April 1393 to negotiate a renewal of the truce with King Enrique of Castile,43 which had been arranged originally by John of Gaunt with king João.
Hard on his return to England Sir William was commissioned in 1394 to attend Lancaster to Aquitaine, this time as duke of the province. In the stately and luxurious court established in Bordeaux Parr evidently carried out the duties assigned to him to the duke's satisfaction for on 18 July 1394 he was appointed—from Bordeaux—Justice of the Forests of the duchy of Lancaster for life. But this colourful interlude in the south ended with Lancaster's return to England in the autumn of 1395. Though Parr was to see them again, Lancaster was unknowingly looking his last on the fruitful vineyards and cornfields of France. After tarrying in Brittany to conclude a treaty with its changeable duke on 25 November, the Lancastrian party proceeded to England where Parr must have been met, soon after his arrival with news of the illness, or possibly the death of his wife, for she died presumably early in the New Year, since Parr was in Kendal in May,45 the first recorded report of his presence there. Before October 1396 he had remarried.46
His second wife was not, as might have been expected of superior wealth or social status to Elizabeth. She was Margaret, widow of Sir Laurence de Dutton, a Cheshire knight who had died before 30 January 1392/3.47 The new marriage was made in such haste that the necessary licence from the king was not obtained. In consequence Lady Margaret had to
"make fine in £12. 4s. 4d. for marriage to William de Par, knight, without licence."48
This was the exact amount of her yearly dower from lands formerly held of the king by the deceased Sir Laurence and valued at £36. 13s. 4d. yearly.49
One of Sir William's first recorded tasks in the north was to import corn from Ireland for the needs of his tenants and household at a time when, it seems, the domestic crop had failed.50 Little is known of the domestic economy of the north west at this time, but a document of 18 Hen. V throws a thin ray of light upon the district, informing us that Cumberland and Lancashire had been accustomed "long since" to obtain much of their grain and bread from Richmond market in Yorkshire: "Many merchants from the adjacent parts of Cumberland, Westmorland, and Lancashire were wont [sic] to resort there with merchandise, grain, victuals and other goods every Saturday in the year, as well as carriers of grain and bread belonging to the adjacent parts of Cumberland, Westmorland and Lancashire and the neighbourhood of Lonsdale,m Craven, Dent and Sedbergh in which no great quantity of corn was then grown, for which reason the inhabitants of those parts made their chief provision of grain in Richmond market . . .
The people of the adjoining counties of Cumberand [sic], Westmorland and Lancashire have thrown into cultivation large tracts of moors and wastes by means of which carriers of grain, using to resort to Richmond from these parts of Lonsdale and Sedbergh, have long since withdrawn from the said market."51
Was Sir William, inspired by recollections of the cornfields of France, one of those who threw "into cultivation large tracts of moors and wastes" in Westmorland?
The fact that he began to play in active part in the county as a commissioner introduces us to two feuds which had a more than local interest. On 1 March 1397 he was appointed to serve on a commission of the peace and of oyer and terminer in Westmorland.52 As the delinquents named were still at large in November 1398 a stronger commission was appointed—Ralph, earl of Westmorland,* Henry Percy, earl of Northumberland,* his son, Henry Percy,* Richard Redman of Levens, William de Culwen, Thomas Colvyll, a Yorkshire knight,* Thomas Tunstall of Thurland Castle,* Thomas Musgrave and the sheriffs of Yorkshire and Westmorland, with John Elyngham the king's sergeant at arms, Richard de Croft,* and John Hudleston, with orders—
"on information of dissensions between John de Preston, and John, son of Thomas de Middleton, John de Blande, Adam Touke, William and Roger de Blande and Thomas Spicer of unlawful assemblies in those counties and the lying in wait of the last named to kill the said John de Preston and his friends, causing homicides, insurrections, riots—to arrest the persons last named and bring them before the king in council, arresting also others to be found of their following."53
Now since 1377, the Blandes and Middletons had been involved from time to time in disturbances of the peace in Yorkshire aimed particularly against Gaunt's officers and property or that of his retainers.54 They were joined later by the Bekwyths55 and the trouble came to a head in February 1393 when Sir Robert de Rokley, Gaunt's forester of the Chace of Knaresborough slew several of the Bekwyths,56 who retaliated by murdering Thomas de Blande, one of their own confederates whom they accused of betraying them to their enemies,57 John de Preston and his friends, whom the Middletons and Blandes with their confederates were lying in wait to kill in 1397 and 1398 was a justice of the King's Bench58 and a landowner in Westmorland having inherited the manor of Preston Patrick near Kendal.59
During the disturbances in Yorkshire he had served on commissions of a strongly Lancastrian character in Westmorland and Yorkshire at least fifteen times since November 1376.60 It seems clear, therefore, from this evidence, that the enmity of the Middletons and Blandes was directed against Preston in his judicial capacity, the justice's "friends" being most probably, his fellow commissioners.
The second feud with which Parr had to deal appears from the names of some of the protagonists to have a certain connection with the first. In November 1398 he and John Elyngham were appointed
"on information of divers dissensions between Edmund Redman, Richard Doket, John and Thomas de Lancaster and others, on the one side, and the Roger de Wyndesore, William, Thomas and John de Bethom, Roland, John and Richard Threlkeld and Christopher Forster on the other . . . to arrest all persons named and their followers . . ."61
The primary cause of these divisions seems to have been a family dispute over the will and property of Sir William de Wyndesore of Heversham, Westmorland, husband of the court beauty, Alice Perrers, mistress of Edward III. Wyndesore had died in 1385 and his three sisters, Margery Duket, Christiana Morieux and Isabel de Wyndesore were found by inquisition to be his heirs.62 Sir William had, however, during his lifetime disposed of some of his property to his nephew John de Wyndesore,63 leaving the bulk of it by will to him and his brothers.64
Of the disputants mentioned in Parr's commission of 1398, Richard Duket was Margery's son,65 Thomas and John de Lancaster, if my deductions from the evidence are correct, were illegitimate sons of Christopher de Lancaster by Isabel de Wyndesore,66 while Edmund Redman was a relative by marriage of the Dukets.67
On the opposing side, Roger Wyndesore was John's brother and one of the beneficiaries of his uncle's will which does not mention any of Sir William's three sisters or their descendants. The Bethoms and Christopher Forster were adherents of the Lancastrian party,68 and John de Preston of the Wyndesores,69 which provides evidence for a connection in the personnel at least between this feud and the first, especially as Christopher Forster was one of those who supported Sir Robert de Rokley, Gaunt's officer, in his feud against the Bekwyths;70 the Threlkelds, Bethoms and John de Preston also shared a common emnity against the abbot of Shap.71
Unfortunately we are given no certain evidence regarding the final outcome of these disturbances. The likelihood is that they were swallowed up—for a time at least—in the great feud of 1399 which ended by Bolingbroke mounting his cousin Richard's throne as Henry IV.
Before that happened Gaunt died on 3 February 1399 and Parr, one of the executors of his will, experienced at first hand King Richard's unscrupulous actions regarding the Lancastrian inheritance. Within a month of Gaunt's death the king had changed Henry of Lancaster's temporary sentence of exile into one for life and seized his vast inheritance, ordering the executors to carry out Gaunt's will as speadily [sic] as possible, but to keep the stock formerly owned by the duke in places appointed by the king and his minsters.72
On Gaunt's death, Richard took Parr into his service, confirming to him "because retained to stay with the king only" the £50 a year for life which the duke had granted to him for the issues of the duchy.73
Exactly what part was played by Parr in the tragic events which ended in Richard's deposition is not known. The usurping king showed himself more than generous to most of those who had aided him to gain the throne, but Sir William only received a confirmation of the grant of the lordship of Ayran made to him by Gaunt seven years previously,74 Taking into consideration the long and faithful service given to the new kings' father, the meagreness of his reward perhaps suggests that Parr had been slow in deciding to support Henry.
But Parr's wide military experience made him invaluable in the north where, in spite of the preliminaries of a truce having been arranged with Scotland at the end of November 1399, Henry had to complain of "very great and horrible outrages perpetrated in England by certain Scots"75 who burned Wark Castle. Parr, under Northumberland and Westmorland, called out the local forces,76 but the trouble blew over when the Scottish government offered profuse apologies.77
In 1400 Henry recognized Parr's diplomatic ability by sending him with John Trevor, bishop of St. Asaph to announce his accession in Spain78 where the young Enrique of Castile and his consort, Katherine of Lancaster were now reigning. Parr was rewarded after his return in 1402—
"to the king's knight, William Par, a stag and hind in season each year for life, within the forest of Inglewode."79
Sir William's last recorded services were the collection of the tenth and fifteenth in Westmorland in December 1402,80 and his appointment with the earl of Westmorland to a commission of array in September 1403.81 If one may deduce from this that Parr was serving with Westmorland when the earl prevented the forces of the rebel Northumberland from joining those of his son Hotspur at Chester, then we are left with no doubts of Parr's wholehearted allegiance to Henry IV, once he was established on the throne.
Before 9 October of the following year Parr was dead.82 His son John was now aged 22 and over, 83 and, until a short time before his father's death had not married. Perhaps Sir William had hoped for further sons by his second wife, for John's early death at the age of 26 or 27,84 and the fact that his name is practically absent from the records, suggests a delicacy of constitutions. A premonition of his own death may have impelled Sir William to arrange a match between his heir and Agnes Devereux, widow of Sir Walter Devereux of Herefordshire, who died in 1403.85
Sir William had not the consolation of knowing about the birth of his grandson Thomas. He may have died tormented by the fear that the line he had worked so strenuously to establish in prosperity might die out. In fact, Thomas was to prove the most prolific of all the Westmorland Parrs, and many of Sir William's descendants were to inherit his fine qualities of courage in war, versatility and adaptability in peace, as well as those of foresight and industry, which, with a certain ruthlessness often inherent in ambitious natures, enabled his descendants to add to the family wealth, prestige and possessions.
These, as left by Sir William and judged comparatively were not great. Much of his income, granted for life, died with him, so that only the fourth part of the manor of Kirkby in Kendale, his in the right of his first wife and worth £40 yearly,86 with one-eighth part of his vill [sic] of Parr, his own inheritance, for which he paid 15d. yearly to his overlord,87 were inherited by John.
But the importance of Sir William's efforts lay in the fact that he had established his family firmly in the ranks of the independent, landed middle class which was to play such an important part in the development of 15TH and 16TH-century England.
On his foundation, using his means—those of natural ability, the favour of powerful patrons and brilliant marriage alliances—Parr's grandson and great grandson were to heighten the family edifice, until its upper storeys reached that rarer air warmed by the sun of royalty itself. They were also to find that the tempests of changing fortune buffeted a taller building more dangerously.
He died (in 1404-S20)(on 4 OCT 1405). For some particulars concerning him see Dep. Keeper's Rep. xl, App. 524; Rep. xxxvi, App. 374; Pal. of Lanc. Chan. Misc. bdle. 1, file 2, n. 66. See also Topographer, iii, 352–60. CHILDREN: John PARR [F11]. {S5,S6,F15,S19,S20,S21}.
- F11. Sir John PARR. Born (about 1355-S5)(before Oct 1382-S21)(about 1383-S8) of Kendal; son of Sir William PARR [F10] and Elizabeth de ROS. He married (3-S8) Agnes CROPHULL (Crophill-S8), daughter of Sir Thomas CROPHILL and Sibyl de la BERE--widow of Sir Walter Devereux. [If Agnes was his third wife, who were one and two? Agnes was of Salisbury, Wiltshire, England. He died (about 1408-S20)(after 1408)(about 4 August 1408-S8). CHILDREN: Thomas PARRE [F12]. {S5, S8,S20,S21}.
- F12. Sir Thomas PARRE. (PARR-S12). Born (about 1380-S5)(1405-S6,S23)(1407-S8)(in 1407-S20), of Kendal, Lancashire, England; son of Sir John PARR [F11] and Agnes Crophull. He married Alice TUNSTALL, daughter of Sir Thomas Tunstall and Eleanor Harrington, of Thurland Castle, Lancashire, England. Alice was born in 1415. Upon his father's death in 1408, Thomas's wardship was granted to his mother, Agnes, Sir Thomas Beauford and Sir Thomas Brounflete.3 Some time in the following nine years, Agnes Parr married John Merbury.4 On 9 July 1413, probably about the same time as the marriage, she surrendered the wardship of her son and his lands to Sir Thomas Tunstall of Thurland Castle, Lancs.5 William Torvar and James Harrington for 200 marks (£133. 6s. 8d.).6 Parr lived at Thurland Castle during his minority and Tunstall married him to his daughter, Alice. The Tunstalls were ardent Lancastrians throughout the fifteenth century, but this had little lasting influence on Parr, whose Westmorland estates bordered those of the Nevilles, earls of Westmorland. When he reached his majority and assumed his Kendal inheritance, a mutually supportive relationship arose between the politically aggressive Nevilles and the aggressively ambitious Parr. Parr's value to the Nevilles depended on his own importance as a local magnate and his future advancement on his ability to furnish aid and support to a patron when needed.
Power in Kendal was based on possession of the lands of the original barony of Kendal, which had been twice divided. The Richmond Fee represented one-half of the original barony, the Lumley and Marquis Fees each a quarter. In the fifteenth century, the lands of the Richmond Fee were normally held by absentee landlords, being granted from royal relative to royal relative. The Lumley Fee, too, went through division and transfer, at one point belonging to Parr's enemies, the Bellingham family. The holders of the Lumley lands, however, had merely local significance; only the Parr lands, or as they were later known, the Marquis Fee, were held continuously until 1571 by one family and progressively augumented [sic] through Clifford and Neville patronage, and after 1461, by royal favouritism.
The first Sir William did little to extend his wife's de Roos holdings,7 preferring to act as an absentee landlord, but Thomas Parr had both the time and the need to consolidate and extend them. Much of the estate was held in dower by three relicts of the Parrs until 1436 when his mother Agnes Parr, the last dowager, died. She had signed her dower portion over to her son in 1429 in exchange for a yearly forty-mark allowance.8 At her death, Parr took the oath of fealty and received full seisin of the dower third of his estate for a fine of two marks.9 Finally, at the age of twenty-eight, in law as well as in fact, Parr could enjoy his full income, amounting possibly to £80-£100 yearly. The estate totalled at least 5083 acres of land, 700 of them arable, and 57 messuages and presumably Thomas also held the small Lancashire estate which was the first Sir William Parr's patrimony. This included lands in Parr and Sutton and a toft in Wigan,10 a parcel held of the Earl of Derby by knight's service, and a yearly rent of 15d. "being thus identified with the quarter of a moiety held by the above-named William in 1370 . . .". Parr, himself, made only one known purchase: a plot called "le Groute by le Howes"11 from one Baldwin Scheppesshed, which he bought to extend his holdings in Helsington.
To counter the recession of income from land, subsisting throughout the greater part of the fifteenth century, Parr turned from outright land purchase to royal leaseholds as a means of increasing both his income and his local political control. Basically there were three of these leaseholds, all of them portions of the Richmond Fee held by Henry V's brother, John, Duke of Bedford, at his death in 1435. In May 1438, Parr was given the keeping of two-thirds of Bedford's lands (the ultimate third went to his widow, Jacquetta) in the Westmorland townships or hamlets of Crosthwaite, Hutton, Strickland Ketel, Frosethwaite and Helsington, the keeping of the fishery on the river Kent, and, in Lancashire, all of Bedford's lands in Whittington. The grant was for ten years, at a yearly farm of £25. 12s. 10d. with a maintenance clause.12 During that time, should anyone else be found willing to offer more, the farm would go to the highest bidder. In February 1439 this grant was reconfirmed, with the addition "that Sir Thomas Parr shall sufficiently build anew, repair and maintain at his own charge one-half part of the Hoton [Hutton] water mill which the King is bound to do and then yield it to the King . . .".13 It is pertinent that in this area the decline in the revenues enjoyed by landlords, especially in Cumberland, was attributable partly to the decline of income from mills.14 Parr enjoyed the income from these lands for only five of the ten years of the original lease. In 1443 all Richmond Fee lands formerly held by Bedford, the Duchess' dower, were granted to the king's favourite, John, duke of Somerset and Earl of Kendal. The income from Richmond Fee lands was roughly three times that of Parr's estates,15 so he cannot have been too pleased at being forced by the king to relinquish them half way through his lease.
In March 1445, another though lesser plum from the lands of Bedford fell into his hands: the keeping of two-thirds of the market tolls, the profits of local fairs, and the profits of "le wyndles et lepes de le weyle, with le bothes, shoppes and scamelles and with the bakery, le bankes and le court house of Kirkby in Kendal".16 This was a twelve-year farm at 60s. a year, but with a clause that should anyone offer more for the farm during that time Parr would lose the lease. Along with it went a twelve-year grant, at 20s. a year, of the keeping of the herbage ". . . of certain meadows and land called Wyryholme alias Holmewery, county Cumberland, with all appurtenances . . .". Six years later, in July 1451, the king raised the rent from £3 to £4 and added a 3s. 4d. per year charge against the income, probably some sort of pension. He also extended the lease for a further twelve years, but it was a gratuitous gesture for twenty months later Henry VI granted the market tolls lease to the Earl of Richmond. Parr, left with a nominal 20s. a year herbage lease, farmed it to his son, William, for sixteen years at the same 20s. rate, presumably with the king's permission, as the original twelve-year lease was due to expire in March 1457. Parr also secured two other local sources of income. These were the tithes of Holme and Mintsfoot which were demised to him at farm in 1431 for 10s. The farm of the Mintsfoot tithe, but not of Holme, was renewed to Parr in 1435, along with ". . . a place of which the name is lost (which) lay fallow in 1431",17 for which he paid 5s.
One final transaction, which may indicate another royal grant of farm, occurred in May 1428, when Parr and Ralph Blennerhasset of Suffolk (probably a scion of the Cumberland Blennerhassets) committed, by mainprise, to John Broughton, esquire, the keeping of five messuages, five bovates of land and ten acres of meadow in the township of Skelton, a burgage in Carlisle and a quit rent of 13s. 4d. a year from another burgage in Carlisle.18 This transaction may have been the subletting of a grant at farm as it was later cancelled by Henry VI, who farmed it directly to Broughton at a flat rate of 26s. 8d. a year.
The final grant made to Parr by the Crown was made by Edward IV on 29 July 1461. This was the wardship and marriage of John Hothom, a distant cousin of the Parrs through the de Thweng family. The Hothoms, an ancient Yorkshire family seated at Scorbrough near Beverley, held extensive lands in Yorkshire, Lancashire and Westmorland.19 Several of their Westmorland properties neighboured those of the Parrs, and Staveley manor was held of one-sixth of one-quarter of the Parrs' manor of Kirkby-in-Kendal, Parr being the effective overlord. It was an exceedingly lucrative wardship, and, as the ward was little more than a baby,20 it extended Parr's influence into Yorkshire and increased his power in Westmorland and Lancashire. His income must have at least doubled if the size of the Hothom estates is any indication. This substantial royal grant and mark of royal favour from the new Yorkist king was the pattern of the future for the next three generations of Parrs.
Thomas Parr's position in his own community is reflected in the types of office he held there. As a leading member of the local gentry, he sat on most of the north-western commissions of the peace and many commissions of array during a thirty-year career. Knighted some time between 1430 and 1432, he was one of a small closed group of local magnates who monopolized all Crown commissions in Cumberland and Westmorland in the fifteenth century. Under Henry VI, he served as a justice of the peace for Westmorland in July 1432, February 1434, March 1437, July 1454 and July 1456. As late as July 1459,21 just two months before he joined his fate irrevocably to the Earl of Salisbury's, Parr was again named to a commission of the peace for Westmorland. Under Edward IV, he was justice for Cumberland in May 1461 and for Westmorland in May and September 1461.22 He was named by Henry VI to the commissions of array for Westmorland of July 1436, July 1437 (also for Cumberland), and November 1448.23 Edward also appointed him to the commission of September 1461 for Westmorland and the May and November 1461 commissions for Cumberland, the latter called to defend the borders from an expected invasion by Henry VI, supported by Scottish troops.
Parr served also on various special commissions. He was appointed in January 1436 to the Westmorland commission for tax assessment to levy the parliamentary subsidy granted in 1435 for the defence of the realm.25 In February 1457, he served on a commission to inquire into the lands held by Thomas Lord Dacre at the day of his death, their value, and the identity of Dacre's lawful heir. In December of the same year, due to the imminent danger of a French invasion, a commission to levy fifty-six archers in Westmorland was sent to Parr, Sir Richard Musgrave, John Crackenthorpe of Hugill, William Lancaster, John Hilton, John Wharton and Henry Bellingham.27 All these were Lancastrian commissions, evidence of the fact that, up until July 1459, Parr was looked upon both as an influential man, whose loyalties were not suspect enough to exclude him from the operation of local government, and one whose cooperation was thought necessary for the government's efficient functioning. Sir Thomas's Yorkist affiliations were soon to become apparent, and he continued his exercise of local power with the full favour of the new Yorkist regime. On 12 November 1460, Parr and his two elder sons served on a commission "to arrest and commit to prison all persons guilty of unlawful gatherings, congregations, associations, combinations and seiges [sic], and if they resist, to call together all lieges of Westmorland and Cumberland and other counties adjacent to fight them". This was an attempt to protect the Yorkist cause in the heavily Lancastrian northern shires. It was reinforced by commissions of peace and array, and, on 6 June 1461,29 another commission was named to arrest recalcitrant Lancastrians, namely Gamaliel Pennington, Christopher Broughton and James Uriel, and bring them before the king's council. The senior commissioners were Sir Thomas Parr and Sir Edward Beetham.
Sir Thomas also held local offices which allowed him a wide latitude of action in the county and supplied him with sources of income and political control. In 1430-31 he was granted the office of escheator in Cumberland and Westmorland30 and in 1435-46 under-sheriff for Westmorland,31 a powerful office because the hereditary sheriff, Lord Clifford, was not a particularly aggressive official. Parr had Clifford's full support in the community and appears to have exercised the extensive powers of the shrievalty with an unhampered hand. Since the sheriff supervised shire court elections to parliament,32 especially in the northern shires, the shrievalty took on the appearance of an executive office and control of this office, in fact if not in title, was tantamount to control of the shire, particularly when the Crown was weak. This all-pervasive involvement by Parr in the affairs of the community, based as it was on his position as under-sheriff, can be seen in the numbers of land transactions which he witnessed or for which he served as trustee, and in the assorted local feuds in which he was involved or on which his influence was brought to bear. These span his entire career during the reign of Henry VI.
An example of the contempt in which the law was held by the local gentry, and the lengths to which they would go to subvert it in their own interests, is the case of Robert Crackenthorpe of Newbiggin. Crackenthorpe, a justice of the peace for Westmorland, appealed to Chancery in a suit against William and Oliver Thornborough and William Lancaster (all established landowners in Westmorland), who "by instigation of Sir John de Lancaster and Katherine, his wife" had waylaid him "with intent to slay",33 as he returned from a session of the peace. "The interesting point is that the offenders included men who had sat in parliament for Westmorland and held commissions of the peace. So powerful was their local standing that it would have been useless to sue them in the country".34 Crackenthorpe's appeal was supported jointly by the Earl of Westmorland and Sir Thomas Parr. The Thornboroughs were "maintained" by the Earl of Salisbury,35 and it is significant that Thomas Parr sided publicly not with them but with Crackenthorpe and Westmorland, Salisbury's very much estranged nephew. The cause of the attack on Crackenthorpe was that, as a justice of the peace, he had held an investigation into a dispute over lands claimed by the Lancasters. Chancery proved unable to solve the situation and so prevent further violence. Crackenthorpe was murdered by the Lancasters and Thornboroughs in August 1443.
The continuing lack of effective control at the national level exacerbated local warfare in the 1440s and 1450s, and in Cumbria divisions deepened between the Percy and Neville factions. In 1453 the rolls of parliament described the situation in Cumberland as "toon half of the shire was divided from tother".37 Conditions were no better in Westmorland. In 1446 Thomas Parr, Sir Thomas Strickland and six others were the recipients of a penal bond of 200 marks from eight bondees "to abide the award of certain arbitrators and to keep peace"38 with Robert Garnett, John Hubbersty and others.
Another typical local feud in which Parr acted as mediator was that of the ubiquitous Thornboroughs and the Threlkelds of Meaburn, 39 who were related by marriage. This dispute, over seven marks from Meaburn manor owed to Threlkeld by William Thornborough, and 13s. 4d. for a black gown for one of Thornborough's servants, involved jury intimidation, coercive violence and extensive litigation. In November 1447, an indenture to keep the peace and settle the dispute was drawn up in the presence of Thomas Parr, Richard Musgrave, John Broughton and Nicholas Leyburne, but such indentures were as much use as miniature dams against tidal waves.
Thomas Parr himself was involved in law-land disputes between 1435 and 1443. In 1440 he lost a legal battle with Thomas, prior of Conishead, when the prior recovered from Parr, by assize of novel disseisin, two messuages, 120 acres of land, six acres of meadow, 100 acres of pasture and 10 acres of wood in Scalthwaitrigg, all of which constituted the Parr interest and right in the Hospital of St. Leonard's Kendal.40 This had been part of the de Roos inheritance, and Parr was forced to quit-claim it to the prior although he did retain the right to present to St. Leonard's chaplaincy.41
The effect of Lord Clifford's support of Parr in his capacity as sheriff, Parr's own influential position locally and his place in parliament are exemplified in the Parr-Bellingham feud, which made itself felt from Westmorland to Westminister. The Bellinghams, of Burneside near Kendal, were a long-established and influential Westmorland family. They also owned land in Helsington near the Parrs and at Strickland Roger. In 1404 the Bellinghams had held 20s. worth of land in Strickland Ketel of the Parrs, which they may still have done thirty years later. It may have been disputes over these lands which provided the spark for the fuse.
In 1441 Henry Bellingham made a complaint in the court of Chancery against Thomas Parr,42 claiming Parr had come to his house at Burneside "with a great multitude of people with intent to destroy and kill". Parr was dissuaded from this intended violence by "true tretyee of gode Gentilmen of the same cuntre". Bellingham however was still receiving threats from Parr, but because of Parr's paramountcy in Kendal, he could not sue him successfully in the county. Robert Bellingham, Henry's father, was indeed a Clifford feoffee but Clifford supported Parr and "the coroners of the same Shire bene his (Parr's) meynyall men".43 Bellingham, therefore turned to the court of Chancery for aid.
Chancery did not satisfy the Bellinghams who took the matter into their own hands. In February 1445,44 Thomas Parr was in London as knight of the shire for Cumberland. He took lodgings "on Cornwallis ground beside the Crane in the Wards of the Vyntrye".45 In the morning of the opening parliament, he and three servants, Robert Duket, Thomas Wryght and Matthew Pierson, left their lodgings for Westminister. On the road to the Thames they were "assaulted with intent to kill" by Henry Bellingham's two younger brothers, Robert an Thomas, together with three other.46 Parr's servants were badly injured and the attackers were arrested. In March, Parr was granted, by private act of parliament, a writ of proclamations addressed to the sheriffs of the city of London, whose writ was to order the Bellinghams to appear before the King's Bench a month from Easter 1446 or be attainted of felony. The outrage to parliament of an attack on one of its members caused the passage of an act "to protect members of Parliament from assault while in Parliament and in transit . . .".47 If assaulted, a member of parliament was to have a writ of proclamation to the appropriate sheriff, "as by an Act in this saide present parliament for Sir Thomas Parr, Knyght, is in like case ordeined to be hade", to be returned at the King's Bench enabling the complainant to demand there the appearance of those against whom the writ was sworn, or else "such execution as is ordeined also in the saide Acte, for ye saide Sir Thomas".
Before this act two statutes had given members of parliament recourse at law for any physical attack perpetrated on them or their servants: in 1432 to protect any lord or commoner attending parliament or council from assault,49 and a Statute of 1403 protecting the servants of a knight of the shire from assault. Thus, when in 1445 the Commons prayed that the remedies and process prescribed in the act for Sir Thomas Parr should be upheld, the king replied that the two prior statutes should provide sufficient redress for the members of the Commons, in effect disallowing Parr's act as a precedent for parliamentary litigation.50
The Bellinghams failed to appear at the King's Bench "for gret fere and drede of the seyd Acts", their fear of reciprocal violence being greater than their fear of the courts. In 1449, however, they petitioned for a settlement of the dispute. In 1449 parliament, in which Thomas Bellingham was a member for Arundel and Parr for Westmorland, Parr's writ of proclamation was annulled as "the parties had come to an agreement51 and Sir Thomas Parr and his servants had received satisfaction",52 The Bellinghams were pardoned at Parr's request. A remnant of the settlement of this feud may exist in an undated boundary settlement between Sir Robert Bellingham and his son, Henry, and Sir Thomas Parr and his son, William. It fixes the boundaries of their contiguous lands in Strickland Roger, which may have been the original source of trouble.
Parr was not always either a combatant or litigant in local land transactions. Frequently, he acted as a witness or mediator for others. In January 1430, he witnessed a quit-claim, with warranty of advowson, of a moiety of the church in Sedbergh in Lonsdale, Yorkshire, from Thomas Harrington, esquire, the son of Sir William Harrington, to Cuthbert, the abbot of Coverham, and the convent of Coverham.54 Early in 1435, along with Sir Nicholas Radcliffe, he testified under oath at Carlisle before William Laton, the escheator for Cumberland, regarding the inquisition post mortem on Sir Peter Tilliol, whose daughter and coheir had married Sir Christopher Moresby, a close friend and later in-law of Parr's.55 In 1437 Sir John de Lamplogh (or Lamplugh) granted to his grandson, John, certain lands and tenements in Preston. Parr, who also held land in Preston, witnessed the grant, together with Richard Musgrave and Sir Thomas Strickland. On 11 August 1446, Parr, Strickland, Nicholas Leyburne and Robert Bellingham witnessed a grant of certain Westmorland lands by Thomas Gate and Robert Preston to Edward Beetham. Beetham held from Parr the manor of Beetham and other lands, worth approximately £40 a year.
In June 1452, Parr acted as trustee for Roland Lenthale, taking livery with the other trustees of one-third of the manors of High Roding, Over Shamall and Ginge Margaret in Essex, previously granted to the trustees to uses by Lenthale, who held the manors in right of his wife Margaret, the sister and coheir of Thomas, Earl of Arundel, with reversion to Edmund Lenthale, her son.57 This shows Parr's sphere of interest extended as far south as Essex and that, as a man of known reputation and influence, he was sought by residents of at least four shires as a witness or trustee. At the local level Parr's position was unassailable as the holder of a large and concentrated estate with a monopoly of shire offices and commissions and one whom the Nevilles regarded with favour. At the national level however his influence was limited to the House of Commons where his initiation was made — in a somewhat unfortunate manner.
As indicated by the sudden increase in disputed elections during the years 1427 to 1429, the statutes governing parliamentary elections were at this time widely abused, due to fraudulent sheriffs, ineligible electors and falsely-returned knights. In 1429 Parliament was originally summoned to meet at Westminster on 13 October. The electors for Cumberland met at a shire court in Carlisle on 30 August and duly elected Sir William Legh and Thomas de la More as that shire's representatives. The date for the opening of Parliament was subsequently brought forward to 22 September and a new summons issued. As there was no regular meeting of the shire court between the receipt of this summons and the opening of the session, the sheriff, Sir Christopher Moresby,58 took it upon himself to make out a new return for the altered date, naming More and Thomas Parr as knights of the shire "in an apparently normally attested indenture".59 The reaction was immediate. In 28 September, by royal letters patent, a full investigation was ordered into the sheriff's actions, the date and place of the first valid election and the second unilateral one, the names of the electors and any other facts regarding the dispute. The first investigation was inactive or inadequate and a new one was ordered the following year on 10 July. There is no proof one way or another indicating whether or not Thomas Parr took his seat, but in all probability he did not. However, it such disputed elections which engendered the Parliamentary Statute of 1429.
Of twenty parliaments covering the years 1439-83, in fifteen returns or partial returns available for Westmorland, eleven returns were made either of a Parr of by a Parr as sheriff in charge of the election. Disregarding the disputed election of 1429, Sir Thomas himself sat in six parliaments — 1435, 1445-46, 1449, 1450-51, 1455-56 and 1459. He represented Westmorland in 1435, 1449, 1450-51, 1455-56 and probably 1459 as well. In 1445-56 he sat for Cumberland. Of the remaining three extant returns, some person connected with the Parrs was either sheriff or returned as knight of the shire in at least two. Combined with Neville patronage, this gave the Parrs a forty-four-year hegemony over Westmorland representation in parliament. The Cumberland elections show a more limited involvement. From 1439-83, seventeen returns or partial returns are available, seven with a Parr directly involved and two with a close friend or relative. This close involvement in parliamentary elections and attendance was to give the Parrs a place near the centre of political events for over forty years.
It was during the 1440s that Sir Thomas evolved a contrivance which he and his sons systematically exploited during this forty-four-year period. It was designed to circumvent the statute which ruled that a sheriff of a county could not be elected by that county to serve in parliament. When Lord Clifford was attainted in 1461 and lost his hereditary shrievalty, the Parrs took over the office on an hereditary basis. Sir Thomas, undoubtedly with Neville backing, having obtained the office of sheriff in one county, proceeded to serve as knight of the shire for another. This device was exploited by the three Parrs, Sir Thomas and his sons, Sir William and Sir John, in the parliaments of 1445-46, 1463-65, 1472-75, and 11478. As the interests of the two shires, Westmorland and Cumberland, were closely allied, and as the Parrs themselves had interests in both, they thus managed to integrate the key positions of the two to provide themselves with an unshakeable hold on the northwest. In the late 1450s, growing violence between the rival houses of York and Lancaster became acute. The Yorkists, facing indictments by the council held at Coventry on 24 June 1459, prepared to take a military stand against their enemies. The Earl of Salisbury, with his northern retainers, marched south to rendezvous with the Duke of York at Ludlow. When the Queen's forces intercepted Salisbury's at Blore Heath in Shropshire on 23 September, the outcome was indecisive. Salisbury rallied his men and, joining forces with York and Warwick, turned to face the royal army at Ludford Bridge near Ludlow. Sir Thomas Parr and several others came to the Earl, not the Duke, to "offer their services".60 Even at this late date, however, Parr considered himself a Salisbury supporter, not a "Yorkist". The Yorkists were out-numbered and were routed on 12-13 October and Parr almost certainly fled with Salisbury, arriving, by way of Devon, at Calais on 2 November. All were subsequently attainted of high treason and all their lands and goods declared forfeit.61 By December 1460 the Crown began to grant Parr's estates away,62 but the triumph of Edward IV reversed the process, and it is hardly likely that, in only a year and a half, Parr's lands suffered too much damage.
Sir Thomas Parr's position before July 1459 is somewhat anomalous. Superficially he was a loyal subject of the Crown, continuing to serve on government-appointed commissions and displaying no overtly rebellious tendencies. McFarlane includes him in a group of "later Yorkists whose attitude in 1450 cannot be presumed . . ."63 The wedge, which finally separated Parr from his allegiance to Henry VI, was his personal commitment to Richard Neville, Earl of Salisbury. In 1420 Henry V had chosen Salisbury for the office of Warden of the West March, an office not merely lucrative but permitting its holder to raise a substantial private army "among the best natural source of fighting men in the country".64 The Earl of Salisbury's enormous income and his friendly relations with the King's council were potent inducements for ambitious northerners like Parr to become his supporters and retainers. Nor was it only Salisbury's position as Warden which attracted Parr, it was also the fact that in 1444 he had been made steward of the Richmond Fee. This brought Salisbury into personal proximity with Parr of Kendal and offered a welcome opportunity for each man to make use of the other's support for the mutual benefit ot both.
In all likelihood, Parr's assumption of Salisbury's patronage must have occurred between 1435, when he opposed Salisbury's retainers, the Thornboroughs, in the Crackenthorpe case and 1438, when he received the Richmond Fee leasehold, possibly through Salisbury's intervention. Some sort or relationship, however, predates even 1435, for as early as 1430 Parr, together with the Earl of Salisbury, his supporter William Fitz-Hugh and Thomas Tunstall, were co-witnesses of a quit-claim,65 Two other close supporters of the Nevilles, Christopher Conyers and Christopher Boynton, were also co-witnesses, as was James Strangways [sic],66 Justice of the Common pleas. Many of these commissions on which Parr served were headed by Salisbury.67 Yet, despite his Neville sympathies and two decades of mutual support, Parr was cautious. He did not appear among the anti-Somerset partisans at the first battle of St. Albans (22 May 1455), nor, seemingly, did he take any irrevocable anti-Lancastrian action until the day he arrived at Ludlow to offer Salisbury his services. Barely a month later, he was an attainted traitor in exile. He must have wished often during those months that he had remained cautious and delayed a little longer. As things turned out, he had made the right decision after all. In 1460 Parr fought beside Salisbury and York at Wakefield. In the battle and the executions which followed, York, his son the Earl of Rutland, and Salisbury died. On three of the four lists of the slain found in later sources the name of Sir Thomas Parr appears.68 Supposedly, his head was impaled above the gates of York. Parr, however, outlived his reported death by another year. In the series of battles which followed Wakefield, no mention of him has survived, and he may have been in all or none of them. He had, however, acquitted himself sufficiently well to earn the new king, Edward IV's, personal gratitude and favour. The wardship of John Hotham was the first of a series of grants which were to increase the Parr holdings and income vastly during Edward's reign. For ten more years, the Parrs supported the Nevilles, in the person of the Earl of Warwick. But just as the good lordship of Salisbury had succeeded that of Lancaster, so the patronage of a king was to prove more desirable than that of his overmighty subject.
Sir Thomas Parr's personal life was as full as his public one. He had not followed his paternal forebears in the pursuit of an eligible heiress. He had married Alice Tunstall, the daughter of his guardian, Sir Thomas Tunstall of Thurland Castle, Lancashire.69 Alice, although from an important family, was no heiress. However, in 1427, her brother, Sir Thomas Tunstall, the younger, married Alianore Fitz-Hugh, widow of Sir Philip Darcy of Knaith, thus bringing Thomas Parr into contact with the Fitz-Hugh family, which by marriage in the next generation, would provide the Parrs with a claim to the lands of the Fitz-Hugh lords of Ravensworth. Parr's eldest son, William, was born in 1434, and his second son, John, in 1438. The Parrs ultimately had nine children, three sons, William, John and Thomas, and six daughters, Anne, Mabel, Margaret, Agnes, Elizabeth and Alianore. They all made advantageous matches and Parr could number among his sons-in-law such northern notables as Humphrey, Lord Dacre of Gilsland, Sir Thomas Strickland and Sir Christopher Moresby.70 The Tunstall connection, despite its paucity of tangible assets, nevertheless proved valuable some sixty years later when Cuthber Tunstall, Bishop of Durham, took very seriously his cousinly duty to befriend and advise the widowed Lady Maud Parr.
By Sir Thomas's death, between mid-November and 4 December 1461, the Parrs had risen in less than a century from a position as all but landless retainers in the household of the Duke of Lancaster to a place as prominent landholders among the Westmorland gentry. Sir Thomas had expanded his grandfather's influence by securing a monopoly of the northwestern shrievalties, as well as the shire seats in parliament. By 1461, when Sir Thomas and his family's contribution to the Yorkist cause was about to launch the Parrs into the court circle, Sir Thomas Parr's position in Westmorland was paramount and unassailable. He had emerged from the mass of local gentry to stand alone as the man or power in Kendal. There were men with nobler titles, who held land and influence in the north, but in Kendal they exercised their influence through Parr. The last Lancastrian king had offered very little to Parr as an inducement for support. With the accession of the house York, the Parrs became royal favourites. The change in administration meant for Thomas Parr a broadening of prospects and opportunities, and although he did not live long enough to take full benefit of these, his sons enjoyed an enviable position as intimates of Edward IV until their deaths. The eldest son, William, was made a Knight of the Garter, an honour commemorated on his fine altar-tomb in the Parr Chapel of Kendal parish church. And his grandson, another Sir Thomas, was not only controller to Henry VIII but father of that monarch's last wife — Katherine. {S20}
Thomas was sub-vice Comes for Westmorland from 1428 to 1437, and was sheriff from 1461 to 1475. He was assaulted in going to parliament in 1446, the case being noticed in parliament and took an active part in the wars of the Roses on the Yorkist side; he was attainted in 1459, with the other leading Yorkists (ib. v. 348-50). Doubtless his attainder was reversed in 1461, as he died (in 1464-S5,S6,S23)(24 NOV 1464-S8). CHILDREN: William PARRE [F13], John PARRE [F14], Thomas PARRE [F15], Margaret PARRE [F16], Ann PARRE [F17], Elizabeth PARRE [F18], Agnes PARRE [F19], Maud PARRE [F20], Eleanor PARRE [F21]. {S5, S6,S8,S19,S20,S23}.
- F13. Sir William PARRE. (PARR). Born in 1434, of Kendal, Lancashire, England; son of Sir Thomas PARRE [F12] and Alice TUNSTALL. He married (1) Joan (TRUSBET-S5,S19)(TRUSBUT-S6), widow of Thomas Colt of Roydon, Essex, England. Joan dsp August 1473 without issue. He married (2) Elizabeth FITZHUGH, daughter of Henry FITZHUGH and Alice Neville, about 1478. The Fitzhughs are illegitimate descendants of Eudes, Count of Penthièvre. Elizabeth was born about 1455. William was made a knight of the Garter by Edward IV and was exempted from the Resumption Act of 1464. He was on the side of the Nevilles at Banbury in 1469, was sent by Clarence and Warwick to Edward in March 1470, just before the battle of Lose-Coat-Fields, and was entrusted by Edward with his answer. When Edward IV returned from exile in 1471 Parr met him at Nottingham, and was rewarded with the comptrollership of the household, which he held till Edward's death. He swore to recognize Edward, prince of Wales, as heir to the throne in 1472 (ib. vi. 234), and was exempted from the resumption act of 1473 (ib. vi. 81). Parr sat as knight of the shire for Westmoreland in 1467 and 1473. He was Sheriff of Cumberland from 1473 to 1483. He was sent to Scotland to arrange about the breaches of the truce probably in 1479. He was exempted from the act of apparel in 1482, was chief commissioner for exercising the office of constable of England in 1483, and took part in the funeral of Edward IV. Member of Parliament for Westmoreland County. It seems probable that he died about this time (cf. Beltz, Memorials of the Garter, pp. 210, lxxii, clxvii), and that the William Parr present at the meeting of Henry VII and the Archduke Philip at Windsor, in 1506, was his second son. William died about 26 FEB 1483-1484. Elizabeth survived him and married (2) Nicholas VAUX of Harrowden. CHILDREN of William and Elizabeth: Ann PARR [F22], Thomas PARR [F23], William PARR [F24], John PARR [F25]. {S5,S6,S8,S19,S23}.
- F14. John PARRE. Of Kendal, Lancashire, England; son of Thomas PARRE [F12] and Alice TUNSTALL. He married the daughter of Sir John YONGE, Lord Mayor of London. He was a Yorkist. He was rewarded by being made sheriff of Westmoreland for life in 1462. He must have lived until after 1473, as in that year he was one of those exempted from the resumption act (ib. vi. 81). CHILDREN: {S5,S6,S19}.
- F15. Thomas PARRE. Of Kendal, Lancashire, England; son of Thomas PARRE [F12] and Alice TUNSTALL. He died in (1471-S6)(1472-S5) at the Battle of (Burnett-S5)(Barnet-S6) Field. CHILDREN: {S5,S6,S19}.
- F16. Margaret PARRE. Of Kendal, Lancashire, England, Lancashire, England; daughter of Thomas PARRE [F12] and Alice TUNSTALL. She married Sir Thomas RADCLYFFE of Derwentwater and Crosthwaite. CHILDREN: {S5,S19,S20}.
- F17. Ann PARRE. (Anne). Of Kendal, Lancashire, England; daughter of Thomas PARRE [F12] and Alice TUNSTALL. She married William HARINGTON of Wresham, Cartmel (Cartmell) and Furness.. CHILDREN: {S5,S19,S20}.
- F18. Elizabeth PARRE. Of Kendal, Lancashire, England; daughter of Thomas PARRE [F12] and Alice TUNSTALL. She married Sir Christopher MORESBY of Moresby and Scaleby Castle. CHILDREN: {S5,S19,S20}.
- F19. Agnes PARRE. Born (about 1440-S5)(about 1443-S8), of Kendal, (Westmorland-S8) Lancashire, England; daughter of Thomas PARRE [F12] and Alice TUNSTALL. She married Thomas STRICKLAND of Syzergh (Sizergh) Castle, son of Walter STRICKLAND and Douce CROFT in 1464. Thomas was born about 1440 at Sizergh Castle, Wes., England. She died about 1490. {S8}. CHILDREN: {S5,S8,S19,S20}.
- F20. Maud PARRE. (Mabel) Of Kendal, Lancashire, England; daughter of Thomas PARRE [F12] and Alice TUNSTALL. She married Humphrey DACRE, Lord Dacre of Guillesland (Gilsland). CHILDREN: {S5,S19,S20}.
- F21. Eleanor PARRE. (Alianore-S20). Of Kendal, Lancashire, England; daughter of Thomas PARRE [F12] and Alice TUNSTALL. She married Sir Henry AGARD. CHILDREN: {S5,S19,S20}.
- F22. Anne PARR. Born about 1480; daughter of Sir William PARRE [F13] and Elizabeth FITZHUGH. She married Sir Thomas CHEYNE of Irthlinghorough, Northamptonshire. She was living in November 1513. CHILDREN: {S5,S6,S19}.
- F23. Sir Thomas PARR. (PARYE-S18). Master of the Wards. KG. Comptroller to Henry VIII. Born about 1483, of Kendal and of Greens Norton, Northamptonshire; son of Sir William PARRE [F13] and Elizabeth FITZHUGH. He married Maud (Matilda) GREENE, daughter of Sir Thomas GREEN and Joan Fogge, of Greene’s Norton and Boughton, Northamptonshire, in 1508. Maud was born in 1493 and died 1 SEP 1531-1532. Thomas was knighted. Sheriff of Northamptonshire in 1509. Sheriff of Lincoln in 1510. He was rich, owing to his succeeding, in 1512, to half the estates of his cousin, Lord Fitz-Hugh, and also to his marriage with Maud, daughter and coheiress of Sir Thomas Green of Boughton and Greens Norton in Northamptonshire. He died on (November 1517-S15)(12 November 1518-S6)(12 Nov 1547-S5), and was buried in Blackfriars Church, London. Upon his death, he was seised of various lands in Parr and Sutton, and a toft in Wigan, one parcel being held of Thomas, earl of Derby, by knight's service and the yearly rent of 15d., being thus identified with the quarter of a moiety held by William [F10] in 1370; another part was held of the Prior of St. John of Jerusalem by the rent of 12d.; and a third, of Bryan Parr, by the rent of 17d. (Duchy of Lanc. Inq. p.m. v, n. 8.). His widow died on 1 September 1532, and was buried beside him. CHILDREN: William PARR [F30], Agnes PARR [F31], Anne PARR [F32], Catherine PARR [F33], Thomas PARR [F34]. {S5,S6,S8, S15,S19,S23}.
- F24. Sir William PARR. First Baron Parr of Horton, Northampton. Born about 1473 (must have been later since he was the son of Elizabeth {S6,S19}); son of Sir William PARRE [F13] and Elizabeth FITZHUGH. He married Mary SALISBURY, daughter of Sir William SALISBURY and Elizabeth WYLDE, (about 1498)(before SEP 1511-S8). Mary was born about 1484 and died on 10 JUL 1555. He was knighted on 25 December 1513, was sheriff of Northamptonshire in 1518 and 1522, and after his niece's Catherine's promotion became her chamberlain. On 23 December 1543 he was created the first Baron Parr of Horton, Northamptonshire. He died dspm 10 SEP 1546-S5)(1547-S6,S8) , and was buried at Horton (for his tomb, see Bridges, Northamptonshire, i. 370). CHILDREN: Elizabeth PARR [F26], Mary PARR [F27], Ann PARR [F28], Maud PARR [F29]. {S5,S6,S8,S15,S19}.
- F25. John PARR. Son of Sir William PARRE [F13] and and Elizabeth FITZHUGH. He married Constance VERE, daughter of Sir Henry VERE of Addington, Surrey, on 15 SEP 1499. He died dsp on 8 SEP 1504. CHILDREN: {S5,S6,S19}.
- F26. Elizabeth PARR. Born about 1499; daughter of Sir William PARR [F24] and Mary SALISBURY. She married Sir Nicholas WOODHULL (Wodhull-S8) (born 1482-died 6 MAY 1531) in 1523. She died (after 6 MAY 1531-S5)(before MAY 1531-s8). CHILDREN: {S5,S8,S19}.
- F27. Mary PARR. Born about 1501; daughter of Sir William PARR [F24] and Mary SALISBURY. She married Sir Thomas TRESHAM of Rushton. CHILDREN: {S5,S19}.
- F28. Anne PARR. Born about 1505; daughter of Sir William PARR [F24] and Mary SALISBURY. She married (1) Sir John DIGBY of Ketilby. She married (2) Sir Henry BROOKE. CHILDREN: {S5,S19}.
- F29. Maud (Madgalen) PARR. Born about 1510-1512 at Horton; daughter of Sir William PARR [F24] and Mary SALISBURY. She married Sir Ralph LANE, son of William LANE and Jane MERVIN. Ralph was born in 1509 at Orlingbury Manor, and died in 1582. CHILDREN: {S5,S19}.
- F30. William PARR. Baron Parr of Kendal, First Earl of Essex, First Marques (Marquis) of Northampton. Esquire of the Body of Henry VIII. Born on 14 August 1512-1513 probably at Kendal Castle; son of Sir Thomas PARR [F23] and Maud GREENE. His father died in 1517, when he was age 5. The Hospitallers held land now called Leafog or LAFFOG. The land was granted before 1193 by William son of Dolfin; Birch Chapel (Chet. Soc.), 189; Ormerod, Ches. (ed. Helsby), i, 675. It is mentioned in the Plac. de Quo Warr. (Rec.Com.), 375. (as Laghoke, 1291; Lathok, 1292; Laghok, 1347), which they granted to a member of one of the Parr families, Sir Thomas Parr of Kendal and William his son holding it in the sixteenth century.
He was created Baron Parr of Kendal in 1539, Earl of Essex in 1543 and Marquess of Northampton in 1547. He was stripped of these title by Mary I in 1553, but they were restored by Elizabeth I in 1559. He married (1) Anne BOURCHIER, daughter of Henry BOURCHIER, on 9 FEB 1526. On April 17, 1543, their marriage was annulled by an Act of Parliament and his children were declared bastards. He married (2) Elizabeth BROOKE, daughter of George BROOK, 4th Lord Cobham, in JAN 1548. Their marriage was declared valid in 1548, invalid in 1553, and valid again in 1558. He married (3) Helen SUAVENBURGH (Helena Snakenborg-S6), daughter of Wolfganus SUAVENBURGH, after 1565. Helen was a lady in waiting, and was from Sweden. William died dspl on 28 OCT 1571 (1570-S15), without acknowledged issue. In the Inquiry p.m. of Sir Thomas Parr; about 1540 William Parr paid 12d. for a messuage called Laghoke, according to the rental in Kuerden, v, fol. 84. On the death of William, with no legitimate issue, the titles became extinct, and his various manors falling to the crown. In 1570 it was granted by Queen Elizabeth to John Dudley. CHILDREN: {S5,S8,S15,S19,S23}.
- F31. Agnes PARR. Daughter of Sir Thomas PARR [F23] and Maud GREENE. CHILDREN: {S5}.
- F32. Anne PARR. Born in 1514; daughter of Sir Thomas PARR [F23] and Maud GREENE. She married William HERBERT, son of Richard HERBERT and Margaret CRADOCK, Earl of Pembroke. William was born in 1506 and died on 17 MAR 1569. He as first earl of Pembroke, of the 10th creation. She died on 20 FEB 1551. CHILDREN: {S5,S8,S19}.
- F33. Catherine PARR. (Katherine-S19). (PARRE). Queen of England. Born about 1512 at Kendal Castle, Westmorland, England; daughter of Sir Thomas PARR [F23] and Maud GREENE. She was tall, vivacious and witty, with a kindly and sensible nature. {S7}. She married (1) Sir Edward de BURGH (Borough-S19), son of Thomas BURGH and Agnes TYRHITT, (about 1527-S6)(in 1529-S5,S7). Edward died in (1529-S6)(1532-S7). He had a troubled inheritance, since his father had been detained due to madness. She married (2) Sir John NEVILL (NEVILLE-S19), 3RD Baron Latymer (Latimer-S19) of Snape, North Yorkshire, (in 1533-S5)(sometime between 1530-1533-S6)(in late spring 1533-S7). John was born 17 NOV 1493 and died on 2 MAR 1543 in London. Poor Latimer was torn between the demands of the rebels (who kidnapped him and, later, his wife and daughter) and those of his angry king. Called to London to explain himself, Latimer was eventually cleared of complicity. But his health was broken from the stress and never recovered. Katharine began to spend more time in London, nursing her husband and visiting with her younger sister Anne. After his death, the rich widow began a relationship with Thomas Seymour, the brother of the late queen Jane Seymour, but the king took a liking to her, and she was obliged to accept his proposal instead. She had drawn the king's attention partly by interceding with him to stop her brother William from asking to have his adulterous wife executed. She married (3) Henry VIII, King of England, on 12 JUL 1543 at Hampton Court Palace. She was his sixth wife. She was the first English Queen consort to enjoy the new title Queen of Ireland following Henry's adoption of the title King of Ireland. As Queen, Catherine was partially responsible for reconciling Henry with his daughters from his first two marriages, who would later become Mary I of England and Elizabeth I of England. She also developed a good relationship with Prince Edward. When she became Queen, her uncle Baron Parr of Horton became her Chamberlain. For three months, from July to September 1544, Catherine was appointed Queen Regent by Henry as he went on his last, unsuccessful, campaign in France. Thanks to her uncle having been appointed as member of her regency council, and to the sympathies of fellow appointed councillors Thomas Cranmer and the Earl of Hertford, Catherine obtained effective control and was able to rule as she saw fit. She handled provision, finances and musters for Henry's French campaign, signed five royal proclamations, and maintained constant contact with her lieutenant in the northern Marches, the Earl of Shrewsbury, over the complex and unstable situation with Scotland. It is thought that her actions as regent, together with her strength of character and noted dignity, and later religious convictions, greatly influenced her stepdaughter, Elizabeth I. Her religious views were complex, and the issue is clouded by the lack of evidence. Although she must have been brought up as a Catholic, given her birth before the Protestant Reformation, she later became sympathetic and interested in the "New Faith". She was reformist enough to be viewed with suspicion by Catholic and anti-Protestant officials such as Bishop Stephen Gardiner and Chancellor Thomas Wriothesley, 1st Earl of Southampton who tried to turn the king against her in 1546. An arrest warrant was drawn up for her, but she managed to reconcile with the king after vowing that she had only argued about religion with him to take his mind off the suffering caused by his ulcerous leg. Henry died on 28 JAN 1547. We can be sure that she held some strong reformed ideas after Henry's death, when the Lamentacions of a Sinner were published in late 1547. However, her work on commissioning the translation of Desiderius Erasmus' Paraphrases shows her more as a MacConica-style Erasmian Pietist. Following Henry's death on 28 January 1547, Catherine was able to marry her old love, Thomas Seymour, now Baron Seymour of Sudeley and Lord High Admiral. She married (4) Thomas SEYMOUR on 3 MAR 1547. She had a rivalry with Anne Stanhope, the wife of her husband's brother. Thomas Seymour was then alleged to have taken liberties with the teenaged Princess Elizabeth, who was living in their household, and he reputedly intrigued to marry her. Having had no children from her first three marriages, Catherine became pregnant for the first time, by Seymour, in her mid-thirties She died in childbirth on 5 SEP 1548 at Sudeley Castle, Gloucestershire, England, and was buried there. Thomas was executed at the Tower of London on 10 MAR 1549. In 1782, a gentleman by the name of John Locust discovered the coffin of Queen Catherine at the ruins of the Sudeley Castle chapel. He opened the coffin and observed that the body, after 234 years, was in a surprisingly good condition. Reportedly the flesh on one of her arms was still white and moist. After taking a few locks of her hair, he closed the coffin and returned it to the grave. The coffin was opened a few more times in the next ten years and in 1792 some drunken men buried it upside down and in a rough way. When the coffin was officially reopened in 1817, nothing but a skeleton remained. Her remains were then moved to the tomb of Lord Chandos whose family owned the castle at that time. In later years the chapel was rebuilt by Sir John Scott and a proper altar-tomb was erected for Queen Catherine. Some of Catherine Parr's writings are available from the Women Writers Project. CHILDREN: Her only child, a daughter, Mary Seymour, born August 30, 1548 appears not to have long survived her mother. The last mention of Mary Seymour on record is on her second birthday, and although stories circulated that she eventually married and had children, most historians believe she died as a child. {S5,S6,S8}.
- F34. Thomas PARR. Son of Sir Thomas PARR [F23] and Maud GREENE. CHILDREN: {S5}.
- F35. Hugh PARR. A division of a tenement in Kearsley held in common by Henry, Earl of Derby, Ralph Assheton of Great Lever, and Ralph Seddon of Pilkington, was made in 1589. The tenement had been Oliver Seddon's, and the following rents were due from it: To the Earl of Derby, 22d.; to Ralph Assheton, 10s. and four hens; and to Ralph Seddon, 6s., two hens, and two days' 'shearing' (reaping). The lands held by Thomas Marcroft in right of his wife Elizabeth are mentioned; Lever Chartul. no. 205. A 'manor' of Kearsley is mentioned among the Earl of Derby's possessions in 1631; Pal. of Lane. Feet of F. bdle. 118, no. 1. Peter Seddon of Prestolee in Prestwich, and Ralph Smith of Unsworth, trustees of Hugh Parr of Kearsley, and John Parr, his only son and heir apparent, settled lands in Kearsley and a house in Manchester in 1654; Hulme D. 111. CHILDREN: John PARR [F36]. {S9}.
- F36. John PARR. Son of Hugh PARR [F35]. CHILDREN: {S9}.
- F37. Alice PARR. In October, 1431, a writ of redisseisin was issued in favour of Robert de Sankey, Hugh de Hindley, and Alice de Parr, against William de Worsley and Alice, widow of Jordan de Worsley, regarding lands and tenements in Pemberton and Hindley; Dep. Keeper's Rep. xxxiii, App. 32. Hugh Worsley of Pemberton is mentioned in 1470; Towneley MS. GG, no. 2671. For a curious claim made after his death see Duchy Plead. (Rec. Soc. Lancs. and Ches.), i, 109. From the preceding note it will be seen that a quarter of the manor is unaccounted for. Nothing further is known of William de Pemberton's daughter Agnes, wife of Alexander de Lynalx. Alice, who married Roger de Atherton, may have been ancestor of the Athertons of later times. It appears from the last note that Robert de Sankey and Alice de Parr were lords of the manor in 1431, in addition to the Worsleys and Hindleys. One of the latter married a Parr heiress, apparently the Alice de Parr just named, so securing the estate they had later in Parr and a second quarter of the manor of Pemberton. The Sankey quarter seems to have descended to Thomas Sankey and Thomas his son and heir apparent, who in 1578 sold it to Thomas Molyneux of Hawkley, in whose family it afterwards descended; Pal. of Lanc. Feet of F. bdle. 40, m. 171. {S10}.
- F38. John PARR. (PARRE). Of Cheshire; son of Thurstan PARRE [F1] and Margaret RADCLIFFE. He married (Ellena-S11)(Ellen-S19) RADCLIFFE, daughter of Richard de Radcliffe and Margaret de Chadderton, about the middle of the fifteenth century. Richard Radcliffe died in 1425. Ellena inherited the Backford estate, which was the main manor, while her sister Elizabeth inherited the Timperley Hall moiety. CHILDREN: John PARR [F185], Thomas PARR [F186], Richard PARR [F187], and six daughters. {S11,S19}.
- F39. (UNKNOWN) PARR. See a former note. Peter de Burnhull seems to have been known also as Peter de Windle; Coram Rege R. 12, m. 87. The local name continued in use; the Parrs were accused of breaking into Alan de Windle's house at Windle and stealing his valuables in 1323; Coram Rege R. 254, m. 46, 47d. {S13}.
- F40. John PARRE. 35. At Lancaster, on Monday next before St. Bartholomew the Apostle, 18 Henry VII. [22nd August, 1502]. Elizabeth, who was the wife of John Parre, demands against Brian Parre the third part of 11 messuages, 200 acres of land, 200 acres of pasture, 60 acres of meadow, and 100 acres of turbary in Parre and Sutton, which she claims as her dower. Brian defends, and says that he is son and heir of the said John Parre, and that the said Elizabeth detained divers charters, &c. The said Elizabeth shall recover her seisin against the said Brian. (fn. 44). {S14}.
- F41. Brian PARRE. See F40. {S14}.
- F42. Richard PARRE. At Lancaster, on St. Bartholomew the Apostle, 18–19 Henry VII. [August, 1503]. Thomas Hesketh, esquire, demands against John Parre, son and heir of Richard Parre, 50 acres of land, 10 acres of meadow, 30 acres of pasture, 6 acres of wood, and 100 acres of turbary in Raynsford. John Parre vouches to warrant William Sowerbotts, &c. The demandant shall recover his seisin against the said John. (fn. 46). CHILDREN: John PARRE [F40?]. {S14}.
- F43. Thomas PARRE. 9 Henry VII., 1493–4. George Stanley, lord le Strange, kt., William Kirkeby, esq., and William Lancastre, esq., de conventione with William Starky and Elizabeth, his wife; Peter Legh, kt., Peter Gerard, and Lawrence Dutton, de forma donationis in descendre against Thomas Botiller, kt.; Edmund Chatterton, clerk, and others, de conventione with Robert Holand, of Clifton, esq., 12th February; William Heton, esq., and others, de conventione with Thomas Osbaldeston, esq.; Thomas, earl of Derby, and others, de conventione with Robert Greene and Margaret, his wife; Thomas, earl of Derby, and others, de ingressu super disseisinam against Thomas Sterakers; Alexander Ambros and Richard Winter, de conventione with Agnes and Margaret, daughters of Richard Walton, for lands in Wodeplumton; and Robert Shakerley, de conventione with Thomas Parr and others, 20th February. {S14}.
- F44. William de PARRE. Born about 1358 in Kempenhough, Lancashire, England; son of Richard de PARRE [F2] and Ellen de WORSLEY. {S14,S25}.
- F45. Hugh de PARRE. Son of Richard de PARRE [F2] and Ellen de WORSLEY. {S14}.
- F46. Henry de PARRE. Son of Richard de PARRE [F2] and Ellen de WORSLEY. {S14}.
- F47. Richard de PARRE. Son of Richard de PARRE [F2] and Ellen de WORSLEY. {S14}.
- F48. John de PARRE. Son of Richard de PARRE [F2] and Ellen de WORSLEY. {S14}.
- F49. Geoffrey de PARRE. Son of Richard de PARRE [F2] and Ellen de WORSLEY. {S14}.
- F50. (Unknown) de PARRE. CHILDREN: Richard de PARRE [F2], Margaret de PARRE [F51]. {S14}.
- F51. Margaret de PARRE. Daughter of (unknown) de PARRE [F50]. Sister of Richard de PARRE [F2]. {S14}.
- F52. Richard de HALSALL. Son of Gilbert de HALSALL [F60]. He held one moiety of the Parr manor before 1290. He married Denise. Denise married (2) Hugh de WORTHINGTON. CHILDREN: Alan de HALSALL of PARR [F53], (Adam de HALSALL [F65]?), (Richard de PARR [F67]?). {S15}.
- F53. ALAN de HALSALL of PARR. (Son of Richard de HALSALL [F52] and Denise-S15)(Son of Henry de Halsall of Parr [F85]-S22)[Compare with F54]. He may be a brother of Adam de HALSALL [F65]. In 1295 Alan gave his son Richard two oxgangs in Parr; one of the witnesses was Gilbert de Halsall [F60]. Assize R. 1321, m. 8 d.. Geoffrey de Parr [F59] released to Alan de Halsall [F53] an oxgang in Parr formerly held by Geoffrey's father Richard; Henry de Parr was a witness. Kuerden MSS. vi, fol. 86, n. 221, 252. As 'Alan de Parr' he was a juror in 1298; Lancs. Inq. and Extents (Rec. Soc. Lancs. and Ches.), 284.. The Halsall moiety was held by Alan until 1301, about which time probably he died. CHILDREN: Richard de HALSALL [F61]. {S15,S22}.
- F54. Henry de PARR. He held one moiety of the Parr manor before 1290. [Is he the same as F55?]. Geoffrey de Parr [F59] released to Alan de Halsall [F53] an oxgang in Parr formerly held by Geoffrey's father Richard; Henry de Parr was a witness. Kuerden MSS. vi, fol. 86, n. 221, 252. CHILDREN: Adam de PARR [F65. see also F96]. {S15}.
- F55. Henry de PARR. The inquisition, taken in 1385, concerning the lands of Thomas de Lathom, who died in 1370, states that he was seised of 'the homage and service of Sir John de Parr, of Robert [F56] son of Henry de Parr [F55], and of William de Parr, who held their tenements in Parr by knight's service and by rendering yearly 6s. 3d.; also of the service of Robert son of Alan de Parr, who held of him tenements in Parr in socage by rendering yearly 3s. 9d.'; all which Thomas de Lathom had held of John de Travers of Whiston by 1d. yearly for all service; Duchy of Lanc. Inq. p.m. ii, n. 7. CHILDREN: Robert de PARR [F56]. {S15}.
- F56. Robert de PARR. Son of Henry de PARR [F55]. Held tenement in Parr by knight's service. The inquisition, taken in 1385, concerning the lands of Thomas de Lathom, who died in 1370, states that he was seised of 'the homage and service of Sir John de Parr [F57], of Robert son of Henry de Parr, and of William de Parr [F58], who held their tenements in Parr by knight's service and by rendering yearly 6s. 3d.; also of the service of Robert son of Alan de Parr, who held of him tenements in Parr in socage by rendering yearly 3s. 9d.'; all which Thomas de Lathom had held of John de Travers of Whiston by 1d. yearly for all service; Duchy of Lanc. Inq. p.m. ii, n. 7. It is shown in the text that Sir John and Robert de Parr held between them half the manor, for which they would pay 5s.; William's part, therefore, belonged to the other half of the manor, but it does not appear why he held it by knight's service and Robert son of Alan the remainder in socage.
CHILDREN: {S15}.
- F57. Sir John de PARR. Held tenement in Parr by knight's service. The inquisition, taken in 1385, concerning the lands of Thomas de Lathom, who died in 1370, states that he was seised of 'the homage and service of Sir John de Parr, of Robert son of Henry de Parr, and of William de Parr, who held their tenements in Parr by knight's service and by rendering yearly 6s. 3d.; also of the service of Robert son of Alan de Parr, who held of him tenements in Parr in socage by rendering yearly 3s. 9d.'; all which Thomas de Lathom had held of John de Travers of Whiston by 1d. yearly for all service; Duchy of Lanc. Inq. p.m. ii, n. 7. It is shown in the text that Sir John and Robert de Parr held between them half the manor, for which they would pay 5s.; William's part, therefore, belonged to the other half of the manor, but it does not appear why he held it by knight's service and Robert son of Alan the remainder in socage.
CHILDREN: {S15}.
- F58. William de PARR. Held tenement in Parr by knight's service. The inquisition, taken in 1385, concerning the lands of Thomas de Lathom, who died in 1370, states that he was seised of 'the homage and service of Sir John de Parr, of Robert son of Henry de Parr, and of William de Parr, who held their tenements in Parr by knight's service and by rendering yearly 6s. 3d.; also of the service of Robert son of Alan de Parr, who held of him tenements in Parr in socage by rendering yearly 3s. 9d.'; all which Thomas de Lathom had held of John de Travers of Whiston by 1d. yearly for all service; Duchy of Lanc. Inq. p.m. ii, n. 7. It is shown in the text that Sir John and Robert de Parr held between them half the manor, for which they would pay 5s.; William's part, therefore, belonged to the other half of the manor, but it does not appear why he held it by knight's service and Robert son of Alan the remainder in socage.
CHILDREN: {S15}.
- F59. Geoffrey de PARR. Son of Richard de PARR [F64]. In 1252–3 Geoffrey de Parr complained of an assault by Gilbert de Halsall [F60], (father of Richard de HALSALL [F52]) and others. Cur. Reg. R. 148, m. 5 d.. Geoffrey de Parr released to Alan de Halsall [F53] an oxgang in Parr formerly held by Geoffrey's father Richard; Henry de Parr was a witness. Kuerden MSS. vi, fol. 86, n. 221, 252. CHILDREN: {S15}.
- F60. Gilbert de HALSALL. In 1252–3 Geoffrey de Parr complained of an assault by Gilbert de Halsall [F60], (father of Richard de HALSALL [F52]) and others. In 1295 Alan de PARR [F53] gave his son Richard [F61] two oxgangs in Parr; one of the witnesses was Gilbert de Halsall. CHILDREN: Richard de HALSALL [F52]. {S15}.
- F61. Richard de PARR. Son of ALAN de HALSALL of PARR [F53]. He was known as Richard de Parr. In 1295 Alan gave his son Richard two oxgangs in Parr; one of the witnesses was Gilbert de Halsall. Assize R. 1321, m. 8 d.. He succeeded to the moiety of Parr manor, and occurs down to 1335; CHILDREN: Alan de PARR [F62], Richard de PARR [F72]. {S15, S22}.
- F62. Alan de PARR. Son of Richard de PARR [F61]. Alan was plaintiff in 1334 against Alice widow of Robert de Parr; William son of John de Parr was one of his pledges. Coram Rege R. 297, m. 11. . He may be the Alan de Parr accused of killing the Millward in 1343. He and his brother Richard are mentioned several times in the assize roll of 1343. He succeeded to the moiety of Parr manor in 1345. He died about 1367. CHILDREN: Robert de PARR [F63]. {S15,S22}.
- F63. Robert de PARR. Son of Alan de PARR [F62]. He succeeded to the moiety of Parr manor. He held his part of the manor for forty years and more. CHILDREN: John de PARR [F81] {S15,S22}.
- F64. Richard de PARR. Son of Geoffrey de PARR [F59]. {S15}.
- F65. Adam de HALSALL. Probably the son of Henry de PARR [F54]. May have been a brother of Alan de HALSALL [F53]; Assize R. 420, m. 8.. Adam de Halsall of Parr and Robert his son are mentioned as holding land in Haydock in 1332. Duchy of Lanc. Forest Proceedings, 1/17, m. 7. Richard de Parr and Adam [F53] his brother, were jurors in 1334.Assize R. 420, m. 5 d.; R. 424, m. 2.. CHILDREN: Richard de HALSALL [F66], Robert de HALSALL [F68]. {S15}.
- F66. Richard de HALSALL. Son of Adam de HALSALL [F65]. Richard was a plaintiff in 1305. Richard de Halsall contributed to the subsidy of 1327 in Parr. Final Conc. (Rec. Soc. Lancs. and Ches.), ii, 82. . His wife's name is given as Cecily in Assize R. 1435, m. 47. Lay Subs. 130/5. {S15}.
- F67. Richard de PARR. Son of Richard de HALSALL [F52]. Richard de Parr and Adam [F53] his brother, were jurors in 1334.Assize R. 420, m. 5 d.; R. 424, m. 2.. CHILDREN: {S15}.
- F68. Robert de HALSALL. Son of Adam de HALSALL [F65]. Adam de Halsall of Parr and Robert his son are mentioned as holding land in Haydock in 1332. Duchy of Lanc. Forest Proceedings, 1/17, m. 7.. CHILDREN: {S15}.
- F69. Robert de PARR. He married Alice. Alan [F62] son of Richard de Halsall [F61] was plaintiff in 1334 against Alice widow of Robert de Parr; William son of John de Parr was one of his pledges. Coram Rege R. 297, m. 11. . CHILDREN: {S15}.
- F70. John de PARR. Alan son of Richard de Halsall was plaintiff in 1334 against Alice widow of Robert de Parr; William [F71] son of John de Parr [F70] was one of his pledges. Coram Rege R. 297, m. 11. CHILDREN: William de PARR [F71]. {S15}.
- F71. William de PARR. Alan son of Richard de Halsall was plaintiff in 1334 against Alice widow of Robert de Parr; William son of John de Parr was one of his pledges. Coram Rege R. 297, m. 11. CHILDREN: William de PARR [F71]. {S15}.
- F72. Richard de PARR. Son of Richard de PARR [F61]. He and his brother Alan are mentioned several times in the assize roll of 1343. CHILDREN: {S15}.
- F73. Richard de PARR. [same as F63] In 1356 Alice daughter of John de Bolton complained that Alan son of Richard de Parr had deprived her of 20s. rent, which she had had by his grant in 1345; she was, however, non-suited; Duchy of Lanc Assize R. 5, m. 14; R. 6, m. 1. He was probably in possession a year earlier, for in 1344 he granted his 'elder brother' Richard land newly approved in Parr; Kuerden MSS., vi, fol. 84, n. 174. The phrase quoted may indicate that he had two brothers, both younger than himself. His widow Agnes in 1367 claimed as dower a third of the moiety of the manor of Parr held by Robert son of Alan and Cecily his wife; De Banc. R. 428, m. 162. CHILDREN: Alan de PARR [F74], Richard de PARR [F76], John de PARR [F81]. {S15}.
- F74. Alan de PARR. Son of Richard de PARR [F73]. He married Agnes In 1356 Alice daughter of John de Bolton complained that Alan son of Richard de Parr had deprived her of 20s. rent, which she had had by his grant in 1345; she was, however, non-suited. Duchy of Lanc Assize R. 5, m. 14; R. 6, m. 1.. He was probably in possession a year earlier, for in 1344 he granted his 'elder brother' Richard land newly approved in Parr; Kuerden MSS., vi, fol. 84, n. 174. The phrase quoted may indicate that he had two brothers, both younger than himself. His widow Agnes in 1367 claimed as dower a third of the moiety of the manor of Parr held by Robert son of Alan and Cecily his wife; De Banc. R. 428, m. 162. He died before 1367. CHILDREN: Robert PARR [F75]. {S15}.
- F75. Robert de PARR. Son of Alan de PARR [F74]. He married Cecily. In 1356 Alice daughter of John de Bolton complained that Alan son of Richard de Parr had deprived her of 20s. rent, which she had had by his grant in 1345; she was, however, non-suited. Duchy of Lanc Assize R. 5, m. 14; R. 6, m. 1.. He was probably in possession a year earlier, for in 1344 he granted his 'elder brother' Richard land newly approved in Parr; Kuerden MSS., vi, fol. 84, n. 174. The phrase quoted may indicate that he had two brothers, both younger than himself. His widow Agnes in 1367 claimed as dower a third of the moiety of the manor of Parr held by Robert son of Alan and Cecily his wife; De Banc. R. 428, m. 162. CHILDREN: Robert PARR [F75]. {S15}.
- F76. Richard de PARR. Son of Richard de PARR [F73]. Received a grant from his brother Alan de PARR [F74] in 1344. In 1356 Alice daughter of John de Bolton complained that Alan son of Richard de Parr had deprived her of 20s. rent, which she had had by his grant in 1345; she was, however, non-suited; Duchy of Lanc Assize R. 5, m. 14; R. 6, m. 1. He was probably in possession a year earlier, for in 1344 he granted his 'elder brother' Richard land newly approved in Parr; Kuerden MSS., vi, fol. 84, n. 174. The phrase quoted may indicate that he had two brothers, both younger than himself. His widow Agnes in 1367 claimed as dower a third of the moiety of the manor of Parr held by Robert son of Alan and Cecily his wife; De Banc. R. 428, m. 162. CHILDREN: {S15}.
- F77. Richard de PARR. Brother of John de PARR [F81]. CHILDREN: Agnes PARR [F78]. {S15}.
- F78. Agnes de PARR. Daughter of Richard de PARR [F77]. Agnes married Thomas de Glest in 1410, Robert son of Alan de Parr being witness to the marriage settlement. Towneley MSS. GG. n. 2089.. {S15}.
- F79. Alan de PARR. CHILDREN: Robert de PARR [[F80]. {S15}.
- F80. Robert de PARR. Son of Alan de PARR [F79]. In 1371 an extent of the possessions of Robert son of Alan de Parr was made before the sheriff. He had two-thirds of a messuage, orchard, and grange, worth 6d. a year after all outgoings; the fourth part of a water-mill, worth 4s., various lands, including the Parheye, worth 36s., &c. Pal. of Lanc. Chan. file, bdle. 1621. From the Lathom inquisition cited above it appears that Robert in 1370 held only three-fourths of the Halsall moiety. {S15}.
- F81. John de PARR. Son of Richard de PARR [F73 and F63]. John was in the succession of the part-moiety of the manor of Parr. He married Ellen de PARR [F84], daughter and coheir of Henry [F83] son of John de Parr [], one of the lords of the other moiety of the manor.
It was probably as the result of this marriage that this share of the manor was increased from three-eighths to over half, or perhaps three-fourths; it will be seen later that the chief-rent is variously stated. He is named in inquisitions down to 1400. Ellen had dower in 1421-1422. when Thomas Baxter, chaplain, gave Ellen, widow of John de Parr, the lands which Adam Taylor lately held of the gift of Robert de Parr [F80?]. Soon afterwards she quitclaimed her right to dower. It would appear that she lived on until 1484. Kuerden, loc. cit. n. 169,208,218.. CHILDREN: Henry PARR [F85]. {S15,S22}.
- F82. John de PARR. Son of Richard de PARR [F111]. Richard [F111] was succeeded in or before 1351 by his son John, sometimes described as a knight. This is apparently when Richard died. See the Lathom inquisition. As John son of Richard de Parr, he in 1351 came to an agreement with Henry [F109] son of Robert de Parr [F110] concerning a parcel of land called Haselhurst; this he gave up to Henry, on condition that the latter recognized his title to parcels called Fallhey, Berewardsleigh, Bentihalgh, and Blackacre. He also confirmed the agreement his father Richard had made with Henry as to the waste; the latter was to have a quarter of it, and a money payment was to be made on account of approvement already made on Henry's lands by Sankey and Nottbrook, towards Morkels Moss; Ct. of Wards and Liveries, box 134, n. FD5. A further agreement was made in 1377 between Sir John de Parr and Henry his son and Robert, son of the above-named Henry de Parr. Robert was to retain possession of the lands of Alan de Bradley, Marion his wife, and Robert their son. The approvements of the wastes were to be divided thus: half to Robert son of Alan de Parr, and of the other half, three parts to Sir John, and one part to Robert son of Henry. Ct. of Wards and Liveries. n. 47, m. 2. In 1376 John de Parr, senior, was executor of the will of his younger brother, John de Parr, junior[F143]. De Banc. R. 461, m. 325. In 1386–7 he appointed Matthew de Sale his attorney for taking seisin from John Perpoint, chaplain. Kuerden, loc. cit. n. 183. In 1337 Richard son of Robert de Parr gave to Richard Parr his uncle and Avice his wife land in Aspcroft which he had received from his brother Henry. In 1370 Alan Ascroft and Mabel his wife surrendered their land to John de Parr. Kuerden, loc. cit. n. 224, 223, 231. John died about 1390, was followed by his son Henry. CHILDREN: Henry de PARR [F83]. {S15}.
- F83. Henry de PARR. Son of John de PARR [F82]. An agreement was made in 1377 between Sir John de Parr and Henry his son and Robert, son of the above-named Henry de Parr. Robert was to retain possession of the lands of Alan de Bradley, Marion his wife, and Robert their son. The approvements of the wastes were to be divided thus: half to Robert son of Alan de Parr, and of the other half, three parts to Sir John, and one part to Robert son of Henry. Ct. of Wards and Liveries. n. 47, m. 2. Henry has been mentioned in the agreement of 1377. In 1370 a settlement had been made, by the agency of John de Barrow of Parr, the remainders being to Henry son of John son of Richard de Parr, and Elias, Nicholas, and Ralph, Henry's brothers; Kuerden, loc. cit. n. 200, 201. Henry succeeded to the moity of Parr manor in 1390. Two deeds of his of 1395-1396 being preserved by Kuerden Kuerden. n. 194, 225, and in 1421 he made a settlement of his estate; ibid. n. 213. See also Pal. of Lanc. Feet of F. bdle. 5, m. 10, concerning 8 messuages in Parr, Warrington, Sutton, and Whiston; the remainder was to Lucy wife of Henry de Byrom. CHILDREN: Ellen de PARR [F84], Lucy de PARR [F138]. {S15,S22}.
- F84. Ellen de PARR. Daughter of Henry de PARR [F83]. She married John de PARR [F81]. Deeds by Ellen, widow of John de Parr, are given by Kuerden (loc. cit. n. 218, 217, 242); by the two latter she made gifts to her sister Lucy, the other coheir, then wife of Henry de Byrom. Ellen and her second husband, Richard de Holt, in 1438 addressed a complaint to the bishop of Bath, as lord chancellor, as to the bad faith of the Byroms. When her father Henry was about eighty years of age he was influenced by Henry de Byrom to divide the manor, giving half to the latter as the share of his wife Lucy, the understanding being that Ellen was to have the other half on her father's death. Such a division was made, and after the father's death, about 1427, Ellen entered into possession. Now, however, the Byroms were putting forth a claim for half of her portion, alleging that the portion they had was an absolute gift, so that Lucy and her heirs had a title to half the rest. See Early Chan. Proc. bdle. 9, n. 28. CHILDREN: Possibly Henry PARR [F85]. {S15.S22}.
- F85. Henry PARR. Son of John de PARR [F81] and Ellen de PARR [F84]. It is not expressly stated that Henry de Parr was the son of the Ellen, but he acted for her in the claim against the Byroms in 1438; Early Chan. Proc. bdle. 9, n. 28. He occurs a year or so earlier in a settlement of the estates; Kuerden, loc. cit. n. 176. He was witness, taking first place after the knights, to a grant by Robert son of Nicholas de Parr in 1439. Ct. of Wards and Liveries, box 13A, n. FD47, m. 1.. He held a moity of the manor of Parr, and also Sutton and Windle. CHILDREN: possibly Henry HALSALL of PARR [F86 (see F54)]. {S15, S22}.
- F86. Henry HALSALL of PARR. Possibly the son of Henry PARR [F85]. He held half (a moity) of the manor of Parr. He married Emma. In 1467 Henry Halsall of Parr enfeoffed James Stanley, clerk, and others of his estates in Parr, Sutton, and Windle; and the following year, as Henry Halsall, lord of Parr, he granted lands to his son Thomas; Kuerden, loc. cit. n. 248, 237. Henry was witness to a Parr deed in 1474, Ct. of Wards and Liveries, box 13A. n. 47, m. 2. Richard Halsall was the first witness in a deed of two years earlier; ibid. m. 5. A branch of the Parr family appears at Backford in Cheshire during the fifteenth century; see Appendices to Dep. Keeper's Rep. xxxvii and xxxix. Another branch was seated at Kempnough in Worsley; Visit. of 1567 (Chet. Soc.), 120. CHILDREN: John HALLSALL of PARR [F87], Thomas PARR [F91], and probably Richard HALSALL of PARR [F92]and possibly Alan de Halsall of Parr [F53]. {S15,S22}.
- F87. John HALLSALL of PARR. Son of Henry HALSALL of PARR [F86]. He married Elizabeth. In the Duchy Feodary of 1483 (Duchy of Lanc. Misc. cxxx) John Halsall was said to hold Parr of John Travers, and he of Lord Dacre, and he of the honour of Lancaster. The mesne lordship of the Stanleys is omitted. In November, 1483, on the engagement of his son Bryan to marry Elizabeth daughter of Robert Shakerley of Lathom, he enfeoffed Henry Shakerley and Thurstan Ainsworth of certain tenements in Parr. Pal. of Lanc. Plea R. 79, and R. 84, m. 2. In 1494 Robert Shakerley of Lathom was plaintiff in a suit against John Parr, Henry Lathom of Mossborough, and John Travers of Hardshaw, and there was a cross-suit; ibid. R. 78, m.5, 5 d. About the same time there was an award between John and Emma Parr, his father's widow; Kuerden, loc. cit. n. 219. She appears to have married a John Molyneux, and was living in 1496; ibid. n. 202. In 1485, as 'John Parr, son and heir of Henry Parr, otherwise called Henry Halsall of Parr,' he joined with John Travers of Hardshaw in a bond of £20 to John Parr, who held part of the other moiety of the manor, and Robert his son to abide the award of James Stanley, archdeacon of Chester, concerning a number of disputes between them, Ct. of Wards and Liveries, box 13A. n. FD38. The corresponding bond by the other John Parr is among the Crosse D. (Trans. Hist. Soc., (New Ser.), vi, n. 71). He enfeoffed William Shakerley and others in 1495–6 of all his lands in Lancashire, except 6 marks of rent held by Elizabeth his wife, &c.; Kuerden, loc. cit. n. 202, 190. He died in or before 1503, when his widow Elizabeth obtained her dower from Bryan Parr. Pal. of Lanc. Plea R. 95, m. 2 d. CHILDREN: Bryan PARR [F88]. {S15,S22}.
- F88. Bryan PARR. Son of John HALLSALL of PARR [F87]. He married Elizabeth SHAKERLEY, daughter of Robert Shakerley of Lathom, in 1483. Upon his marriage, his father enfeoffed Henry Shakerley and Thurstan Ainsworth of certain tenements in Parr. Pal. of Lanc. Plea R. 79, and R. 84, m. 2. Bryan was in posession of a moity of the manor of Parr in 1497. In this year Bryan Parr and Elizabeth his wife and John (either his father or the other John Parr)[F93], brought cross-suits as to Pal. of Lanc. Plea R. 83, m. 7, 8. In 1505. He gave a bond to the other John Parr {F93] and Robert his son [F94] to abide an arbitration concerning the eighth part of the water-mill of Parr, and various other matters in dispute. Ct. of Wards and Liveries, box 13A. n. FD48. In 1503, Bryan gave his widowed mother, Elizabeth her dower. Pal. of Lanc. Plea R. 95, m. 2 d. Bryan and John Parr were counted among the gentry of the hundred in 1513. He died early in 1528. CHILDREN: Thomas PARR [F89]. {S15,S22}.
- F89. Thomas PARR. Son of Bryan PARR [F88]. He came into possession of a moity of the manor of Parr upon the death of his father in 1528, being then age twelve years. He is stated to have held the manor of Parr of the earl of Derby by the tenth part of a knight's fee and a rent of 7s. 3½d. i.e. (Duchy of Lanc. Inq. p.m. vi, n. 51.). He held nearly three-fourths of the whole manor; the Parrs of Kendal held an eighth, so that the remaining eighth was left for the other Parr family. The wardship of the heir was granted to Henry bishop of St. Asaph and Thomas Radcliffe of Chadderton; Dep. Keeper's Rep. xxxix, App. 558. He died in 1559, and the moity was granted to his son William. Thomas's will is printed in full in Piccope's Wills. Chet. Soc., iii, 118. He desired to be buried in the church of Prescot, and to have a trental of masses celebrated, leaving 10s. for this purpose. His widow Margaret married John Byrom, a descendant of Henry de BYROM. There were disputes between Richard and Thomas Parr and the Arrowsmith family in 1547 and 1549. Ducatus Lanc. (Rec. Com.), i, 228, 243. CHILDREN: William PARR [F90], and nine younger children. {S15,S22}.
- F90. William PARR. Son of Thomas PARR [F89]. He came into possession of a moity of the manor of Parr in 1559, at age nineteen years, upon the death of his father. The rent was then stated as 7s. 7½d. (Inq. p. m. xi, n. 19. ) and the manor was held 'as of the manor of Knowsley.' This William Parr it was who disposed of the manor of Parr to his step-father, John Byrom of Byrom in Makerfield. William's wife was Katherine, daughter of Thomas Eccleston of Eccleston; Visit. of 1567 (Chet. Soc.), 98. Settlements appear to have been made by William Parr in 1562, perhaps on his marriage, and in 1565; Pal. of Lanc. Feet of F. bdle. 24, m. 102; 27, m. 18. He had already begun to dispose of his estates to John Byrom; ibid. bdle. 26, m. 181. She in 1565 cited her husband in the Ecclesiastical Court for adultery and for leaving her without necessaries; Raines MSS. (Chet. Lib.), xxii, 206. The moity of Parr manor remained in the Byrom family for a century and a half, and they seem to have made the hall their principal residence. It was sold, with the other Byrom estates, in the time of George I, and became very much subdivided. The manorial rights were then lost. There does not seem to be any record of the sale of the manor itself, which is named in the inquisition after the death of John Byrom as held of the earl of Derby by the tenth part of a knight's fee and a rent of 5s. 7½d.; Duchy of Lanc. Inq. p.m. xvi, n. 37. In this inquisition a settlement made by William Parr [F?] is recited, the final remainder of the manor being to John Byrom. Kuerden has preserved several documents relating to these sales; loc. cit. n. 192–3, 180, 204, 226–8; and a bond in £2,000 given in 1597 by Henry Parr [F?] to Henry Byrom, sons of William and John respectively, may point to the conclusion of the transfer; ibid. n. 246. John Byrom had married Margaret, the widow of Thomas Parr, by 1560, in which year he had a dispute with William Parr concerning Hurst House in Parr; Ducatus Lanc. ii, 221. There were numerous other disputes between the two families and their lessees; ibid. iii, 5, 33, 38, 63, 99. Hurst House appears to have been in the possession of William Atherton and Katherine his wife in 1599; ibid. iii, 394. A marriage licence for Peter Byrom, gentleman, and Katherine Parr was granted at Chester on 8 July, 1575; Pennant's Account Book (Ches. Dioc. Reg.). CHILDREN: {S15}.
- F91. Thomas HALSALL of PARR. Son of Henry HALSALL of PARR [F86]. In 1468 Henry Halsall, lord of Parr, granted lands to his son Thomas. Kuerden, loc. cit. n. 248, 237.. CHILDREN: {S15}.
- F92. Richard HALSALL of PARR. Probable son of Henry HALSALL of PARR [F86]. Richard Halsall was the first witness in a deed with Henry in 1472. Ct. of Wards and Liveries, box 13A. n. 47, m.. CHILDREN: {S15}.
- F93. John PARR. He lived in Parr at the same time as John HALSALL of PARR [F87]. He and his son Robert recieved a bond from Bryan PARR [F88] in 1497 to abide an arbitration concerning the eighth part of the water-mill of Parr, and various other matters in dispute. Ct. of Wards and Liveries, box 13A. n. FD48. CHILDREN: Robert PARR [F89]. {S15}.
- F94. Robert PARR. Son of John PARR [F93]. He and his father John recieved a bond from Bryan PARR [F88] in 1497 to abide an arbitration concerning the eighth part of the water-mill of Parr, and various other matters in dispute. Ct. of Wards and Liveries, box 13A. n. FD48. CHILDREN: {S15}.
- F95. Katherine PARR. A marriage licence for Peter Byrom, gentleman, and Katherine Parr was granted at Chester on 8 July, 1575. Pennant's Account Book (Ches. Dioc. Reg.). CHILDREN: {S15}.
- F96. Adam de PARR. [see F65]. probably a son of Henry de PARR [], Lord of Parr; or son of John de PARR [F159]. A fourth part of the Halsall moiety appears to have been early formed into a separate estate or mesne manor, but the evidence regarding it is defective. Adam son of John de Parr in 1301 was defendant to a claim made by Robert son of Henry de Parr; Assize R. 1321, m. 10 d. Adam de Parr had a share of the lordship in 1313. CHILDREN: {S15, S22}.
- F97. Simon de PARR. Somewhat earlier than 1313, Simon de Parr held or claimed two oxgangs of land in the manor of Parr. Simon de Parr was plaintiff in 1305, claiming from Richard de Parr [F?] and others 11 messuages and 2 oxgangs; and was at the same time defendant in suits brought by Richard son of Adam de Halsall, and Gilbert son of Alan de Parr. Assize R. 420, m. 5d. 8. CHILDREN: Alan de PARR [F98]. {S15}.
- F98. Alan de PARR. Son of Simon de PARR [F97]. CHILDREN: Richard de PARR [F99]. {S15}.
- F99. Richard de PARR. Son of Alan de PARR [F98]. He died about 1350. CHILDREN: Richard de PARR [F100]. {S15}.
- F100. Richard de PARR. Son of Richard de PARR [F99]. When his father died in 1350, he inherited the 1/4th moiety of the manor of Parr, and his wardship was claimed by Katherine de Lathom. Duchy of Lanc. Assize R. 1, m. 2, 1d.; R. 2, m. 1d., iiijd. This claim shows that the heir held directly of the Lathoms. {S15}.
- F101. Alan de PARR. Simon de Parr was plaintiff in 1305, claiming from Richard de Parr [F?] and others 11 messuages and 2 oxgangs; and was at the same time defendant in suits brought by Richard son of Adam de Halsall, and Gilbert son of Alan de Parr. Assize R. 420, m. 5d. 8. CHILDREN: Gilbert de PARR [F102]. {S15}.
- F102. Gilbert de PARR. Son of Alan de PARR [F101]. Simon de Parr was plaintiff in 1305, claiming from Richard de Parr [F?] and others 11 messuages and 2 oxgangs; and was at the same time defendant in suits brought by Richard [F104] son of Adam de Halsall [F103], and Gilbert son of Alan de Parr. Assize R. 420, m. 5d. 8. {S15}.
- F103. Adam de HALSALL. Simon de Parr was plaintiff in 1305, claiming from Richard de Parr [F?] and others 11 messuages and 2 oxgangs; and was at the same time defendant in suits brought by Richard son of Adam de Halsall, and Gilbert son of Alan de Parr. Assize R. 420, m. 5d. 8. CHILDREN: Richard de HALSALL [F104]. {S15}.
- F104. Richard de HALSALL (de PARR?). Son of Adam de HALSALL [F103]. Simon de Parr was plaintiff in 1305, claiming from Richard de Parr [F?] and others 11 messuages and 2 oxgangs; and was at the same time defendant in suits brought by Richard son of Adam de Halsall, and Gilbert son of Alan de Parr. Assize R. 420, m. 5d. 8. {S15}.
- F105. Henry de PARR. Son of Henry de PARR [F108]. He married Alice. Held a moiety in Parr Manor in 1291. (Assize R. 1294, m. 8.). Henry's widow, Alice, in 1301 brought a suit against the lords of Parr, Henry son of Henry, and Alan. (Assize R. 1321, m. 8d.). This Henry son of Henry de Parr, who may have succeeded much earlier than 1301, lived till 1332. He seems, however, practically to have resigned the manor to his sons Robert and Richard. Henry son of Henry de Parr appeared in a Sutton case as early as 1284. Assize R. 1265, m. 21d. Henry de Parr commenced an action against John son of Thomas de Wrightington in 1297; in 1305 the latter was joined in the defence by Alice his wife, whose sister Christiana is also mentioned. De Banc. R. 162, m. 11d.; Assize R. 420, m. 8. It appears that Alice [F114] was the daughter of Henry [F113], son of Roger de Parr [F112]. Kuerden MSS. vi, fol. 86 n. 238. He died before 1337. His widow Alice in 1337 came to an agreement with Richard [] son of Henry Parr [], as to lands here; Kuerden, loc. cit. n. 196, 197. She was still living in 1348; see below. She was suing for dower in 1331. De Banc. R. 286, m. 17; R. 290, m. 60 d.; R. 292, m. 66. CHILDREN: Robert de PARR [F110], Richard de PARR [F111]. {S15}.
- F106. Lawrence de PARR. CHILDREN: Henry de PARR [F107]. {S15}.
- F107. Henry de PARR. Son of Lawrence de PARR [F106]. In he 1246 recovered from Roger son of Hugh half an oxgang of land at Parr Manor. (Assize R. 404, m. 10d. This was, perhaps, an earlier Henry.). {S15}.
- F108. Henry de PARR. CHILDREN: Henry de PARRR [F105]. {S15}.
- F109. Henry de PARR. Son of Robert de PARR [F110]. Henry son of Robert granting to Henry de Parr, senior [F105], 6s. a year for life; Kuerden MSS. vi, fol. 84 n. 240, 235 and 179, 209. With this Henry begins a series of fifty-one charters (originals or copies) preserved among the records of the Ct. of Wards and Liveries, their existence here being no doubt due to the disputes as to the inheritance in the reign of Hen. VIII. The earliest are grants in Aug. 1331, by Richard son of Henry de Parr to Henry son of Robert of various lands and reversions, and a share of the mill; Ct. of Wards and Liveries, box 13A, n. 47, m. 6. Three years later the same Richard de Parr released to Henry 'all his right in the fourth part of the moiety of the manor of Parr,' with certain small exceptions in the Overfield, Sonyhel, Micklecroft, and a croft by the hall, &c.; ibid. n. FD19. In 1335 there followed the grant of land between the wood of Parr and a field called Gilleridings; ibid. n. FD47, m. 1. In 1348 this Henry de Parr granted his son Robert all his lands in Parr and his part of the mill; with the reversion of lands held by his mother Alice. The remainders were to the daughters Alice, Agnes, and Joan. Ibid. CHILDREN: Robert de PARR [F146], Alice de PARR [F147], Agnes de PARR [F148], Joan de PARR [F149]. {S15}.
- F110. Robert de PARR. Son of Henry de PARR [F105]. claimed the moiety as his right. His descendants, however, are found to have held but a quarter of it. In 1316–17 Henry de Parr gave to Richard his son 40 messuages and land in Parr, Robert son of Henry de Parr being a witness; and there was a further grant eight years later; Kuerden MSS. vi, fol. 84, n. 184, 222. About 1317 Robert son of Henry de Parr surrendered his lands to his father. Robert was of some prominence in the district, but his descendants had only a quarter of this moiety. Richard [F111] son of Henry de Parr, and Adam de Parr contributed to the subsidy of 1327; the father is not mentioned, and Robert was perhaps dead at this time; Lay Subs. 130/5. The peculiar relations between the brothers Richard and Robert are shown in a plea of 1317, in which Robert son of Henry de Parr, 'in mercy for many defaults,' was summoned to answer for seizing and detaining Richard's cattle in the early part of 1316 in a certain place called Kayhull. In defence he asserted that Richard held of him a moiety of the manor of Parr by fealty and the service of 5s., and the rent having been in arrears for five years he seized the cattle. Richard said that Kayhull was outside Robert's fee; De Banc. R. 220, m. 313. Earlier than this, in 1313, Robert son of Henry de Parr had complained that the lords of the other moiety of the manor—Richard son of Alan de Halsall, and Adam his brother—with William Wolrich and others, had unjustly disseised him of 5s. of rent; Assize R. 420, m. 2. In 1313, Robert son of Henry de Parr had complained that the lords of the other moiety of the manor—Richard son of Alan de Halsall, and Adam his brother—with William Wolrich and others, had unjustly disseised him of 5s. of rent; Assize R. 420, m. 2. Robert died before his father, for in 1325 Henry son of Robert de Parr began a suit of novel disseisin against Henry de Parr and Richard his son, which appears to have gone on for some years; Assize R. 426, m. 1d. Henry claimed the moiety of the manor, and the jury agreed that Henry the elder had disseised the plaintiff, the damages being taxed at 40s.; Assize R. 1404, m. 18d. Robert son of Henry de Parr, and John his brother have an unfavourable mention in the Coram Rege R. of 1323 (n. 254). The former was indicted for the death of John de Bickerton at Leyland church and for breaking into Alan de Windle's house; he pretended to be dumb at the trial; m. 46. The latter was accused of the death of two men, and seems to have been hanged; m. 48. See also m. 49d. 60. Henry de Parr is said to have been related to Robert de Holland; ibid. m. 60. See also m. 51, 51d, for his part in the overthrow of Adam Banastre in 1315. CHILDREN: Henry de PARR [F109], (John de PARR?) [F144], Richard de PARR [F145]. {S15}.
- F111. Richard de PARR. Born probably about 1290-1295; son of Henry de PARR [F105]. In 1316–17 Henry de Parr gave to Richard his son 40 messuages and land in Parr, Robert son of Henry de Parr being a witness; and there was a further grant eight years later; Kuerden MSS. vi, fol. 84, n. 184, 222. Richard [F111] son of Henry de Parr, and Adam de Parr contributed to the subsidy of 1327; the father is not mentioned, and Robert was perhaps dead at this time. Lay Subs. 130/5. In 1328 John de Wrightington gave lands in Parr to Richard, son of Henry de Parr. Kuerden MSS. vi, fol. 86, n. 254. About 1331 Richard son of Henry de Parr surrendered his lands to his father. The moiety of Parr Manor was held of Richard and his descendants, who were lords of the moiety. In 1326–7 Richard de Parr married Ellen TYLDESLEY, daughter of Adam de Tyldesley, by whom he had five sons.
The peculiar relations between the brothers Richard and Robert are shown in a plea of 1317, in which Robert son of Henry de Parr, 'in mercy for many defaults,' was summoned to answer for seizing and detaining Richard's cattle in the early part of 1316 in a certain place called Kayhull. In defence he asserted that Richard held of him a moiety of the manor of Parr by fealty and the service of 5s., and the rent having been in arrears for five years he seized the cattle. Richard said that Kayhull was outside Robert's fee; De Banc. R. 220, m. 313. Earlier than this, in 1313, Robert son of Henry de Parr had complained that the lords of the other moiety of the manor—Richard son of Alan de Halsall, and Adam his brother—with William Wolrich and others, had unjustly disseised him of 5s. of rent; Assize R. 420, m. 2. In 1337 a settlement of the manor was made, the remainders being to Richard's sons John, John, Henry, William, and Robert; Kuerden, loc. cit. n. 198, 199, 210. There appears to have been another son, Simon; Kuerden, loc. cit. n. 191. Richard was living in 1346. Richard was succeeded in or before 1351 by his son John [F82], sometimes described as a knight. This is apparently when Richard died. De Banc. R. 348, m. 235d. CHILDREN: John de PARR [F82], John de PARR, Jr. [F143], Henry [], William [], and Robert []; Simon de PARR [F97]. {S15}.
- F112. Roger de PARR. CHILDREN: Henry de PARR [F113]. {S15}.
- F113. Henry de PARR. Son of Roger de PARR [F112]. CHILDREN: Alice de PARR [F114]. {S15}.
- F114. Alice de PARR. Daughter of Henry de PARR [F113]. Henry de Parr [F105] commenced an action against John son of Thomas de Wrightington in 1297; in 1305 the latter was joined in the defence by Alice his wife, whose sister Christiana is also mentioned. De Banc. R. 162, m. 11d.; Assize R. 420, m. 8. It appears that Alice [F114] was the daughter of Henry [F113], son of Roger de Parr [F112]. Kuerden MSS. vi, fol. 86 n. 238. {S15}.
- F115. Thomas PARR. Born about 1730 in Virginia. He married Mary. He died in 1797 in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. CHILDREN: Claiborn PARR [F116], Bridges PARR [F117], John PARR [F118], Thomas PARR [F119], Allen PARR [F120], (daughter) PARR [F121]. {S17}.
- F116. Claiborn PARR. Born 1766-1770; son of Thomas PARR [F115] and Mary. He married Martha Ivey about 1793, probably in South Carolina. Claiborn wrote his last will and testament 25 April 1818 in Union County, South Carolina. He left the plantation to his wife Martha during her life or widowhood, with the exception that his son James was to have a horse. Each of the (unnamed) children were to receive a part of the estate as they reached legal age. Thomas Pair and Martha Pair were named as executors. Witnesses were Sherwood nance, Willis Walker and Christopher Brandon. The will was signed Claybourn (X) Pair (His mark). The will was proved 21 August 1830. (Union County, South Carolina Will Abstracts 1787- 1849, Brent Holcomb) The children of Claiborn and Martha Ivey Parr are:
- John, b. abt 1794 - d. aft 1860 - m.1st Malinda; 2nd Mary
- James, b. abt 1796 - d. ?? - m. Nancy
- Elizabeth b.15 Mar 1797 - d. abt 1849 - m. Thomas Nance
- Rebecca, b. abt 1799 - d. abt 1850 - m. Isham/Isom Vaughn
- Jesse, b. abt 1802 - d. ?? - m. Nancy Scales
- Allen, b. abt 1804 - d. ?? - m. ?? Scales
- Thomas, b. abt 1806 - d. ?? - m. ??
- Mary, b. abt 1809 - d. abt 1892 - m. Joel Ivey Adams
- Sally, b. abt 1812 - d. ?? - m. William Motte
- Charlotte, b. abt 1814 - d. ?? - m. William Scales.
Claiborn died about 1830. {S17}.
- F117. Bridges PARR. Born about 1761-1770; son of Thomas PARR [F115] and Mary. He married Penelope Howze about 1800. He died about 1839 n Butts County, Georgia. CHILDREN: {S17}.
- F118. John PARR. Born about 1766-1774; son of Thomas PARR [F115] and Mary. He married Elizabeth Hobbs. He died about 1827. CHILDREN: {S17}.
- F119. Thomas PARR. Born about 1770-1773; son of Thomas PARR [F115] and Mary. He married Dorcas. He died on 13 MAR 1849. CHILDREN: {S17}.
- F120. Allen PARR. Son of Thomas PARR [F115] and Mary. CHILDREN: {S17}.
- F121. (daughter) PARR. Born about 1790; daughter of Thomas PARR [F115] and Mary. She married David Nicholas. She died about 1850. CHILDREN: {S17}.
- F122. William PARR. Born in 1807 in Honington, Lincolshire, England. He married Harriett WRIGHT (b. 1817 Barkston Lincs-d. 1903 Lincolnshire) in 1852. He died in 1889 in Barkston, Lincolshire, England. CHILDREN: William PARR [F123], John PARR [F124], Edward PARR [F125], Mary PARR [F126]. {S18}.
- F123. William PARR. Born in 1854 at Barkston, Lincolnshire, England; son of William PARR [F122] and Harriett WRIGHT. He married Sarah JACKSON in 1876. They had 11 children. {S18}.
- F124. John PARR. Born in 1857 at Barkston, Lincolnshire, England; son of William PARR [F122] and Harriett WRIGHT. He married (Sarah ?). They had at least, a son, Sidney [F127]. {S18}.
- F125. Edward PARR. Born in 1861 at Barkston, Lincolnshire, England; son of William PARR [F122] and Harriett WRIGHT. He married Selina CORBY in 1881. They had 5 children. {S18}.
- F126. Mary PARR. Born in 1861 at Barkston, Lincolnshire, England; daughter of William PARR [F122] and Harriett WRIGHT (twin to Edward). {S18}.
- F127. Sidney PARR. Son of John PARR [F124] and (Sarah?). {S18}.
- F128. Thomas PARR. He married Mary Ann Steele at St Helens, Lancashire, England. Children were Alexander PARR [F129], Thomas PARR [F130], John PARR [F131], (daughter) PARR [F132], and James PARR [F133]. {S18}.
- F129. Alexander PARR. Born 29 DEC 1840 near Peasley Cross; son of Thomas PARR [F128] and Mary Ann STEELE. He married Mathilda Letitia Richards of Liverpool around 1860 and emigrated to the US in 1885. They had 9 children. {S18}.
- F130. Thomas PARR. Son of Thomas PARR [F128] and Mary Ann STEELE. {S18}.
- F131. John PARR. Son of Thomas PARR [F128] and Mary Ann STEELE. {S18}.
- F132. (daughter) PARR. Daughter of Thomas PARR [F128] and Mary Ann STEELE. {S18}.
- F133. James PARR. Son of Thomas PARR [F128] and Mary Ann STEELE. {S18}.
- F134. Thomas PARR. (Old Parr). Called the most famous of Britain's old men. Born in February or March 1483 in Glyn by Winnington, Shropshire, England; son of John PARR [F135]. Winningon is a small hamlet in the parish of Alberbury, thirteen miles west of Shrewsbury. He went into the service at age 17. His father died in 1518. He then took over the family land. He married for the first time at age 80, to Jane TAYLOR. He bore a child (a boy) of Katharine MILTON in 1588 at age 105, for which he was placed in the stocks. His wife Jane Taylor died in 1595.In 1605, at age 122, he married Jane Floyd, or Flood, widow of Anthony ADDA. In 1635 the Earl of Arundel took him to London. He died at the age of 152 on 14 November 1635 in London, England. He was buried in Westminster Abby. CHILDREN: (son) PARR, died within 10 weeks; Jane PARR, lived only 3 weeks. {S18,S23}.
- F135. John PARR. A Yeoman farmer of Glyn by Winnington, Shropshire, England. He died in 1518. CHILDREN: Thomas PARR [F134]. {S18}.
- F136. Lawrence PARR. CHILDREN: Henry PARR [F137]. {S22}.
- F137. Henry PARR. Son of Lawrence PARR [F136]. He was living in 1246, when he held half of the manor of Parr. {S22}.
- F138. Lucy de PARR. Daughter of Henry de PARR [F83]. She married Henry de BYROM. about 1420 Henry de Byrom married Lucy a daughter and co-heir of Henry son of John de Parr. The marriage took place in or before 1422; Pal. of Lanc. Feet of F. bdle. 5, m. 10.
John Byrom, apparently the son of Henry, who received £20 on the marriage, espoused Margaret daughter of William de Lever of Great Lever in 1437; Add. MS. 32103; Lever D. no. 126, 127. Margaret is called the widow of John Byrom in 1473 (Kuerden MSS. vi, fol. 84, no. 207), but John seems to have been living in 1476; Culcheth D. no. 257, 259. Deeds by Ellen, widow of John de Parr, are given by Kuerden (loc. cit. n. 218, 217, 242); by the two latter she made gifts to her sister Lucy, the other coheir, then wife of Henry de Byrom. Ellen and her second husband, Richard de Holt, in 1438 addressed a complaint to the bishop of Bath, as lord chancellor, as to the bad faith of the Byroms. When her father Henry was about eighty years of age he was influenced by Henry de Byrom to divide the manor, giving half to the latter as the share of his wife Lucy, the understanding being that Ellen was to have the other half on her father's death. Such a division was made, and after the father's death, about 1427, Ellen entered into possession. Now, however, the Byroms were putting forth a claim for half of her portion, alleging that the portion they had was an absolute gift, so that Lucy and her heirs had a title to half the rest. See Early Chan. Proc. bdle. 9, n. 28. {S22}.
- F139. Nicholas de PARR. Son of Robert de PARR [F146]. He married Agnes Halsall de PARR [F140].Robert son of Henry was in possession in 1370, as appears by the inquisition of Thomas de Lathom. In 1375 he made a grant to his son Nicholas of lands in the Holyend and the Middlefield, apparently on the occasion of the marriage of Nicholas with Agnes daughter of Robert son of Alan de Parr, of the Halsall family. The first remainder was to grantor's heirs by Cecily daughter of John Whitehead of Lathom. John de Rainford, Richard de Parr of Shaw, and William de Holland of Cayleigh were among the witnesses; ibid. m. 2. The agreement of 1377 between the several lords of the manor, in which Robert's claim to a quarter of this moiety was recognized, has been given above. Little seems to be known of Nicholas beyond his first marriage with Agnes de Parr (or Halsall) above recorded, and his second union with Katherine daughter of John Benetson, the heiress of Lydiate. The latter, being out of her mind, in 1408 at Prescot granted all her patrimony to Ralph de Parr, probably a son of Nicholas by his former wife; Lancs. Inq. p.m. (Chet. Soc.), i, 102. Katherine lived till 1437; Dep. Keeper's Rep. xxxiii, App. 22, 38. Thurstan son of Ralph de Parr is mentioned in several later documents, about 1485; and Ralph his son also occurs. John de Parr received from the feoffee in 1429–30 lands which had belonged to Nicholas de Parr; Kuerden MSS. vi, fol. 84, n. 185. He died before 1415. CHILDREN: Robert de PARR [F152]. {S22}.
- F140. Agnes Halsall de PARR. Daughter of Robert de PARR [], son of Alan de PARR []. She married Nicholas de PARR [F139]. {S22}.
- F141. John de PARR. Son of Robert de PARR [F155]. From the inquisition after the death of Robert's son John it appears that in April, 1527, John Parr granted, as dower, certain lands to his mother Grace, who was still living in 1531. Duchy of Lanc. Inq. p.m. vi, n. 3. From this it appears that Robert Parr, the grandfather, in 1513 made a settlement on the marriage of this John and Katherine his wife; the latter was living in 1531. The premises in Parr were held of the earl of Derby by knight's service, but by what part or what rent was unknown; the clear value was £7. The premises in Lathom were held in the same manner, and were worth 26s. 8d. a year. John died in May, 1530. CHILDREN: Grace de PARR [F142]. {S15,S22}.
- F142. Grace de PARR. Daughter of John de PARR [F141]. Grace, about eighteen months old at her father's death; she was made the king's ward, but the estate was claimed by her uncle Bryan as heir male. (Duchy Pleadings (Rec. Soc. Lancs. and Ches.), ii, 196.) The result does not appear, but Grace afterwards married Henry ECCLESTON, a younger son of the local family. This appears by a fine of 1552; Pal. of Lanc. Feet of F. bdle. 14, m. 145. The remainders were to Thomas son of Henry and Grace, and then to Thomas, Henry's brother. The latter, the head of the Eccleston family, had in 1549 received a number of Parr deeds from the court; Ct. of Wards and Liveries, box 13A, n. FD47. From a schedule of deeds in the Piccope MSS. (Chet. Lib.), xiv, 97, it appears that the estates of this branch of the Eccleston family in Broadoak (Parr), Lathom, and Sutton descended to a Henry Eccleston, whose son Edward in 1671 married Thomasine Tickle. They had two daughters—Margery, who married Thomas Lyon, and Esther, whose son Edward Barton was living in 1721. Although this branch of the Parrs appears to have been entitled to a fourth part of their moiety, no claim to a manor was made in the sixteenth century. The estate was known as Broad Oak. Through Grace, Henry Eccleston inherited part of the Parr manor estates. CHILDREN: {S15, S22}.
- F143. John PARR, Jr. Son of Richard PARR [F111], and brother of John PARR [F82]. {S15}.
- F144. (John de PARR?). Possible son of Robert de PARR [F110] {S15}.
- F145. Richard de PARR. son of Robert de PARR [F110]. His wife was named Margery. Assize R. 1435, m. 34. {S15}.
- F146. Robert de PARR. Son of Henry de PARR [F109]. In 1348 Henry de Parr granted his son Robert all his lands in Parr and his part of the mill; with the reversion of lands held by his mother Alice. The remainders were to the daughters Alice, Agnes, and Joan. Robert son of Henry was in possession in 1370, as appears by the inquisition of Thomas de Lathom. In 1375 he made a grant to his son Nicholas of lands in the Holyend and the Middlefield, apparently on the occasion of the marriage of Nicholas with Agnes daughter of Robert son of Alan de Parr. The first remainder was to grantor's heirs by Cecily daughter of John Whitehead of Lathom. John de Rainford, Richard de Parr of Shaw, and William de Holland of Cayleigh were among the witnesses; ibid. m. 2. The agreement of 1377 between the several lords of the manor, in which Robert's claim to a quarter of this moiety was recognized, has been given above. Robert de Parr [F146] had married, no doubt as his second wife, a certain Alice, who seems to have been a Hindley; at least, lands were given by Gilbert de Hindley to Robert and Alice and their issue. CHILDREN: Robert de PARR [F151], Nicholas de PARR [F139]. {S15}.
- F147. Alice de PARR. Daughter of Henry de PARR [F109]. In 1348 Henry de Parr granted his son Robert all his lands in Parr and his part of the mill; with the reversion of lands held by his mother Alice. The remainders were to the daughters Alice, Agnes, and Joan. {S15}.
- F148. Agnes de PARR. Daughter of Henry de PARR [F109]. In 1348 Henry de Parr granted his son Robert all his lands in Parr and his part of the mill; with the reversion of lands held by his mother Alice. The remainders were to the daughters Alice, Agnes, and Joan. {S15}.
- F149. Joan de PARR. Daughter of Henry de PARR [F109]. In 1348 Henry de Parr granted his son Robert all his lands in Parr and his part of the mill; with the reversion of lands held by his mother Alice. The remainders were to the daughters Alice, Agnes, and Joan. {S15}.
- F150. Robert de PARR of Shaw. In 1375 Robert de PARR [F146] made a grant to his son Nicholas [F139] of lands in the Holyend and the Middlefield, apparently on the occasion of the marriage of Nicholas with Agnes. The first remainder was to grantor's heirs by Cecily daughter of John Whitehead of Lathom. John de Rainford, Richard de Parr of Shaw [F150], and William de Holland of Cayleigh were among the witnesses. He may be the Richard son of Richard de Parr of the Shaw of 1390; Townley's MS. GG, n. 2436, 2878 (feoffments of his lands in Parr and Widnes). Alice widow of Richard de Parr of the Shaw, and his daughter Margaret, widow of William de Ireland, were parties to deeds made in 1411; ibid. n. 2702, 2463. By a deed of the next year Ellen daughter of Richard de Pemberton quitclaimed to Alice all her right in a messuage called the Hollinhead in Parr; ibid. n. 2376. CHILDREN: Maragaret de PARR [F158]. {S15}.
- F151. Robert de PARR. Son of Robert de PARR [F146]. {S15}.
- F152. Robert de PARR. Son of Nicholas de PARR [F139]. Robert son of Nicholas de Parr made a feoffment in 1427 to Richard Haydock, rector of Sefton, of his capital messuage, with his lands, rents, and services, &c., and all his part of the mills; also messuages in Ormskirk and Lathom; Ct. of Wards and Liveries, box 13A. n. FD14. Another feoffment was made in 1438; ibid. n. 47, m. 5, and n. FD31. In the next year he mortgaged certain of his lands to Henry Byrom and John Byrom his son; the names given are White Carr in Pyefield, Riding, Dewbriddies, Sekynhullacre, and Mosshouse; ibid. n. FD47, m. 1. In 1462 there was an arbitration between him and the above-named Thurstan Parr, followed by a sale in 1463; ibid. n. 47, m. 3, 5. The arbitration records among other points that Robert had given Thurstan stone for a kiln; Robert was to be during his life 'free to dry his proper corns and malt' in Thurstan's kiln, as compensation for the latter's delay in returning an equal amount of stone. In 1466 Robert Hindley was plaintiff against John Parr, son of Robert; Charles Parr, Thomas Parr, Henry Parr; Robert Parr [F152], son of Nicholas [F139]. Robert granted Elizabeth his wife land in Parr (Plat Lache and White Carr) and Lathom for her life in 1472, and made a general feoffment in 1479; ibid. n. 47, m. 5 and 2; n. FD22. Lived until about 1482. CHILDREN: John de PARR [F153]. {S15}.
- F153. John de PARR. Son of Robert de PARR [F152]. John Parr, 'son and heir of Robert Parr,' first occurs in 1466, when he was already the father of three sons—John, Robert, and Reynold—on whom he settled all his goods and chattels, movable and immovable, alive or dead; ibid. n. FD6. John, at that time his 'son and heir,' is not mentioned later; and in 1482 the father, as heir of Robert Parr, 'lately deceased,' described Robert as his 'son and heir,' and released to him his patrimony in Ormskirk, including an acre by the mill of Greetby; ibid. n. 47, m. 5. In the following year he leased Ashen Carr to Thurstan Parr, and gave his part of the water-mill of Parr to his son Robert; ibid. n. 47, n. FD2; n. 47, m. 3. From this time there are a number of documents bearing upon disputes between the father and son, and two, already quoted, upon those between them and the lord of the manor. In March, 1512, he leased the Heighfield, Tode Hill, &c., to Ralph Molyneux, priest, and Bryan Molyneux; in October, 1513, his widow Constance made an agreement with his son Robert as to an arbitration about her dower; ibid. n. FD9, FD41, FD29, FD35. The arbitration is n. FD33. An agreement between John Parr and Robert his son and heir in 1484 mentions the latter's wife; and in 1485 and 1488 there were fresh grants by the father to his son; ibid. n. 47, m. 3; 44, 1, 4; n. FD49. In 1493 Robert Parr made a feoffment of his land in the Sekeneld and Riding; and a further one in 1507; ibid. n. 47, m. 4. n. FD40, FD7, FD39; in these deeds Robert's father is described as John Parr of Broadoak, and Robert's wife is named as Joan. Early in 1511 another agreement was made with the father; ibid. n. FD3. Another deed mentions Robert Parr in 1513, and his son Robert is described as 'heir apparent of Robert Parr, senior,' in 1520; ibid. n. FD21, FD26. Must have been a very aged man when he died in 1512 or 1513. CHILDREN: Robert de PARR [F155], John de PARR [F156], Reynold de PARR [F157]. {S15}.
- F154. Thurston PARR. In 1462 there was an arbitration between Robert de PARR [F152] and Thurstan Parr, followed by a sale in 1463; ibid. n. 47, m. 3, 5. The arbitration records among other points that Robert had given Thurstan stone for a kiln; Robert was to be during his life 'free to dry his proper corns and malt' in Thurstan's kiln, as compensation for the latter's delay in returning an equal amount of stone. In 1474, Robert Hindley and Alice his wife and John Parr were plaintiffs against Thurstan Parr; ibid. R. 41, m. 11. In 1475 the first two appeared against Thurstan Parr and Ralph his son; Roger Parr, son of Edward; Alice Parr, and others, as to a seizure of their goods; ibid. R. 43, m. 3; R. 44, m. 6. The following year, 1476, Thurstan Parr accused Hugh Hindley of Hindley, Robert Hindley and Alice, and others, of damaging his corn and grass; ibid. R. 44, m. 6d. Also R. 45, m. 5, and R. 47, m. 16. See further in the account of Aspull; also Ducatus Lanc. i, 163, &c. {S15}. CHILDREN: Ralph PARR [F179].
- F155. Robert de PARR. Son of John de PARR [F153]. He married Grace. An agreement between John Parr and Robert his son and heir in 1484 mentions the latter's wife; and in 1485 and 1488 there were fresh grants by the father to his son; ibid. n. 47, m. 3; 44, 1, 4; n. FD49. In 1493 Robert Parr made a feoffment of his land in the Sekeneld and Riding; and a further one in 1507; ibid. n. 47, m. 4. n. FD40, FD7, FD39; in these deeds Robert's father is described as John Parr of Broadoak, and Robert's wife is named as Joan. Early in 1511 another agreement was made with the father; ibid. n. FD3. Another deed mentions Robert Parr in 1513, and his son Robert is described as 'heir apparent of Robert Parr, senior,' in 1520; ibid. n. FD21, FD26. Living in 1520. Robert Parr in 1523 leased to Richard Halsall of Parr, tailor, a close called the Middle Riding; the father was probably dead at this time; ibid. n. FD8. He was dead by 1527. CHILDREN: John de PARR [F141]. {S15}.
- F156. John de PARR. Son of John de PARR [F153]. {S15}.
- F157. Reynold de PARR. Son of John de PARR [F153]. {S15}.
- F158. Margaret de PARR. Daughter of Robert de PARR of Shaw [F150]. She married William de IRELAND. Alice widow of Richard de Parr of the Shaw, and his daughter Margaret, widow of William de Ireland, were parties to deeds made in 1411; ibid. n. 2702, 2463. {S15}.
- F159. John de PARR. CHILDREN: Adam de PARR [F96]. {S15}.
- F160. John de PARR. Richard son of Patrick the Smith and Agnes his wife granted to John de Parr an acre in Sutton in 1320–1321. Kuerden MSS, vi, fol. 86, n. 212. He was perhaps the John son of Henry de Parr of 1328. De Banc. R. 274, m. 59 d. {S15}.
- F161. Adam de PARR. Adam in 1347. Adam de Parr in 1342 brought a claim for novel disseisin against Richard son of Henry de Parr, Alan son of Richard de Parr, lords of the manor, and Alice widow of Robert de Parr; Assize R. 1435, m. 47. Shortly afterwards Alice seems to have married the claimant, though she must have been an elderly woman; De Banc. R. 348, m. 235 d. From this case it appears that Adam's title was derived from Henry de Parr. {S15}.
- F162. Robert de PARR. Born about 1300; son of Adam de PARR [F166]. Wigan de Laghok had land here in 1246, claimed by Richard de Flixton as his by descent; the claim was not prosecuted; Assize R. 404, m. 8. Roger de Laghoke was plaintiff against the lords of the manor in 1291; they had, he said, prevented him taking estovers, viz. housebote and heybote, in 40 acres of wood, as well as mast for his pigs; they had also raised a hedge across the direct way to the wood of Laghok, so that now he had to go nearly two leagues round, and the road to the pasture was also closed by it. The jurors ordered the hedge to be pulled down, but agreed that Roger had sufficient mast outside the 40 acres of wood recently enclosed. Assize R. 1294, m. 8. Hugh de Laghoke was non-suited in a claim against Roger in 1292; Assize R. 408, m. 54 d. William son of Hugh de Laghok gave a release of claim in Platt in Withington in 1314; Birch Chapel (Chet. Soc.), 192. Henry de Laghok and Alice his wife were with companions in 1343 accused of having in May the previous year invaded certain lands at Parr, 'with force and arms, to wit, with swords, bows and arrows.' The complainants were Robert son of Adam de Parr, Alice widow of Roger de Laghok, and John, Roger's son; Assize R. 430, m. 3, 3 d. In 1367 John son of Roger de Laghoke was plaintiff in a suit against Henry de Laghoke and Alice his wife; Assize R. 1435, m. 39d. CHILDREN: {S15}.
- F163. Bartholomew PARR. (1713-1800). He married (1) ?. He married (2) Johana Burgess. CHILDREN of Bartholomew and Johanna: Bartholomew Parr [F168]. [S23].
- F164. John PARR. CHILDREN: Thurston PARR [F165].
- F165. Thurston PARR. Son of John PARR [F164]. There were numerous suits with neighbouring landowners; Ducatus Lanc. iii, 275, &c. Shortly afterwards, in 1600, Thurstan eldest son of John Parr claimed possession from Thomas Fox and others; ibid. iii, 424. These were probably occupiers only. In 1617–8 Sir Thomas Tyldesley and Thomas Tyldesley his son and heir held a manor in Parr; Pal. of Lanc. Feet of F. bdle. 91, n. 38. {S15}.
- F166. Adam de PARR. Wigan de Laghok had land here in 1246, claimed by Richard de Flixton as his by descent; the claim was not prosecuted; Assize R. 404, m. 8. Roger de Laghoke was plaintiff against the lords of the manor in 1291; they had, he said, prevented him taking estovers, viz. housebote and heybote, in 40 acres of wood, as well as mast for his pigs; they had also raised a hedge across the direct way to the wood of Laghok, so that now he had to go nearly two leagues round, and the road to the pasture was also closed by it. The jurors ordered the hedge to be pulled down, but agreed that Roger had sufficient mast outside the 40 acres of wood recently enclosed. Assize R. 1294, m. 8. Hugh de Laghoke was non-suited in a claim against Roger in 1292; Assize R. 408, m. 54 d. William son of Hugh de Laghok gave a release of claim in Platt in Withington in 1314; Birch Chapel (Chet. Soc.), 192. Henry de Laghok and Alice his wife were with companions in 1343 accused of having in May the previous year invaded certain lands at Parr, 'with force and arms, to wit, with swords, bows and arrows.' The complainants were Robert son of Adam de Parr, Alice widow of Roger de Laghok, and John, Roger's son; Assize R. 430, m. 3, 3 d. In 1367 John son of Roger de Laghoke was plaintiff in a suit against Henry de Laghoke and Alice his wife; Assize R. 1435, m. 39d. CHILDREN: Robert de PARR [F162]. {S15}.
- F167. The Hindleys of Aspull were concerned in various suits as to lands in Parr in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. In 1466 Robert Hindley was plaintiff against John Parr, son of Robert; Charles Parr, Thomas Parr, Henry Parr; Robert Parr [F152], son of Nicholas [F139]; William Parr; Robert Parr, son of John—all described as 'gentlemen'—and others. It appears that Alice Hindley, plaintiff's wife, had been seized and detained, together with some of his goods. Pal. of Lanc. Plea R. 30, m. 9, 10. Robert de Parr [F146], the father of Nicholas [F139], had married, no doubt as his second wife, a certain Alice, who seems to have been a Hindley; at least, lands were given by Gilbert de Hindley to Robert and Alice and their issue. Eight years later, 1474, Robert Hindley and Alice his wife and John Parr were plaintiffs against Thurstan Parr; ibid. R. 41, m. 11. In 1475 the first two appeared against Thurstan Parr [F154] and Ralph [F179] his son; Roger Parr, son of Edward; Alice Parr, and others, as to a seizure of their goods; ibid. R. 43, m. 3; R. 44, m. 6. {S15}.
- F168. Bartholomew PARR. M.D., (1750-1810), medical writer, born at Exeter in 1750, was the son of Bartholomew Parr [F163] (1713-1800) by his second wife, Johana Burgess.[S23].
- F169. PARR, ELNATHAN (d. 1632?), divine, was educated at Eton school, and was thence elected in 1593 to a scholarship at King's College, Cambridge, where he graduatd B.A. in 1597, M.A. in 1601, and B.D. in 1615.[S23].
- F170. PARR, GEORGE (1826-1891), cricketer, born at Radcliffe-on-Trent, Nottinghamshire, on 22 May 1826, was the son of a gentleman farmer whose ancestors had farmed their own land for more than two hundred years. He died, unmarried, in the village of his birth, after a long and painful illness, on 23 June 1891.[S23].
- F171. PARR, JOHN (1633?-1716?), dissenting minister, born about 1633, was doubtless related to Dr. Parr, bishop of Man (J.E. BAILEY in the Antiquary, ix. 118; BAINES, Lancashire, ii. 718; Sir G. F. DUCKETT, Duchetiana, pp. 24 seq.)[S23].
- F172. PARR, REMIGIUS (1747), engraver, is stated to have been born at Rochester in Kent in 1723. He is either the father or brother of Nathaniel PARR [F173]. [S23].
- F173. PARR, NATHANIEL (1730-1769), angraver, appears to have been either father or elder brother of Remigius PARR [F172]. [S23].
- F174. PARR or PARRE, RICHARD (c1592-1644), bishop of Sodor and Man, was born about 1592 in Lancashire, probably at Wood, in the parish of Eccleston, near Chorley, a seat of the Parr family. [S23].
- F175. PARR, RICHARD, D.D. (1617-1691), divine, was born in 1617 at Fernoy, co. Cork, of which parish his father, Richard Parr, was perpetual curate. At his birth his mother was fifty-five years of age. [S23].
- F176. Samuel PARR. (1747-1825), pedagogue, born at Harrow-on-the Hill on 26 Jan. 1746-7, was the son of Samuel and Anne Parr. The Parrs traced their descent to Sir Thomas Parr (d. 1464), the great-grandfather of Catherine Parr, sixth wife of Henry VIII. . . Samuel, vicar of Hinckly, Leicestershire, married the daughter of Francis Brokesby. [S23].
- F177. Samuel PARR. Of Harrow-on-the Hill. He married Anne. CHILDREN: Samuel PARR [F176].
- F178. Henry de PAR. The earliest definite records of the name in England include those of Henry de Par, who was living at Parr, in the County of Lancaster, as early as 1216. [S19].
- F179. Ralph PARR. Son of Thurston PARR [F154]. In 1475 Robert Hindley and Alice his wife appeared against Thurstan Parr and Ralph his son. {S15}.
- F180. Henry de PAR. Of Parr manor, in 1318. [S19].
- F181. Richard de PAR. Of Lancashire, in 1338. [S19].
- F182. Alan de PAR. Of Lancashire during the reign of Edward III (circa 1327-1377). [S19].
- F183. Oliver PARRE. Son of Richard PARRE [F5]. [S19].
- F184. Oliver PARR. Born about 1477 in Kempenhough, Lancashire, England; son of Hugh PARRE [F6] and Constance TYLDESLEY. [S19,S25].
- F185. John PARR. Son of John PARR [F38] and Ellen RADCLIFFE. John died without issue. [S19].
- F186. Thomas PARR. Son of John PARR [F38] and Ellen RADCLIFFE. He married (1) Margery. He married (2) ?. CHILDREN of Thomas and Margery: William PARR [F188]. [S19].
- F187. Richard PARR. Son of John PARR [F38] and Ellen RADCLIFFE. CHILDREN: Randolph PARR [F190]. [S19].
- F188. William PARR. Son of Thomas PARR [F186] and Margery. He married Elizabeth BARROW, daughter of Robert BARROW. [S19]. CHILDREN: Robert PARR [F189]. [S19].
- F189. Robert PARR. Son of William PARR [F188] and Elizabeth BARROW. He married (1) Elizabeth ROGERS, daughter of Ralph Rogers of Chester. He married (2) Eleanor LANGTON, daughter of Robert Langton of Lancaster. CHILDREN: [S19].
- F190. Randolph PARR. Son of Richard PARR [F187]. CHILDREN: Thomas PARR [F191]. [S19].
- F191. Thomas PARR. Son of Randolph PARR [F190]. CHILDREN: John PARR [F192], Thomas PARR [F193]. [S19].
- F192. John PARR. (PARRE). Of Cheshire; son of Thomas PARR [F191]. [S19].
- F193. Thomas PARR. (PARRE). Of Cheshire; son of Thomas PARR [F191]. [S19].
- F194. Robert PARR. Reverend. Another early line of the family in England was that of the Reverend Robert Parr of Pembroke College, Oxford, who was Rector of Kirkby Malory in 1660. By his wife Mary, he was the father of Samuel, Robert and John of whom the first two both followed the ministry. The first, the Samuel Parr, was and left issue there by his wife, of CHILDREN: Samuel PARR [F195], Robert PARR [F196], John PARR [F197]. [S19].
- F195. Samuel PARR. Reverend. Son of Robert PARR [F194] and Mary. Vicar of Hinckley in Leicestershire, in 1701. He married Dorothy Brokesby. CHILDREN: Robert PARR [F198], Francis PARR [F199], Samuel PARR [F200], Dorothy PARR [F201]. [S19].
- F196. Robert PARR. Reverend. Son of Robert PARR [F194] and Mary. [S19].
- F197. John PARR. Son of Robert PARR [F194] and Mary. [S19].
- F198. Robert PARR. Son of Samel PARR [F195] and Dorothy BROKESBY. [S19].
- F199. Francis PARR. Son of Samel PARR [F195] and Dorothy BROKESBY. [S19].
- F200. Samuel PARR. Son of Samel PARR [F195] and Dorothy BROKESBY. [S19].
- F201. Dorothy PARR. Daughter of Samel PARR [F195] and Dorothy BROKESBY. [S19].
- F202. Robert PARR. The first of the name in America was Robert Parr, who was living in 1623 in Charles River County, VA. Nothing, however, is definitely known of his immediate family or descendants. [S19].
- F203. John PARR. He married Phoeby Brombell on 1 Jun 1680 at St Michael in the District of Huyton, Liverpool. {S26}.
- F204. Alice PARR. She married William Welsby on 3 August 1680 at St Michael in the District of Huyton, Liverpool. {S26}.
- F205. William PARR. Of Sutton. He married Ellin Chadock of Leverpool on 30 January 1722 at St Michael in the District of Huyton, Liverpool. {S26}.
- [S1]. Radcliffe Family. http://www.tudorplace.com.ar/RADCLIFFE3.htm.
- [S2]. GEN-MEDIEVAL-L Archives. RootsWeb.com. Nan Runde research. http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/read/GEN-MEDIEVAL/2000-03/0952218083. QUOTES as sources: a) John Insley Coddington, "Some Ancestors of Henry Gregory: Worsley and Parr," TAG 38 (July 1962). b) Grant Gregory, comp., Ancestors and Descendants of Henry Gregory, (Provincetown, MA, 1938).
- [S3]. The Morris Clan. http://www.themorrisclan.com. QUOTES as sources: a) http://members.tripod.com/murielc/ransom/fam00649.htm. b) Ancestors of Dorothy Elizabeth McDowell Morris. http://www.gunboatempires.com/genealogy/DMM_4.htm c) Descendants of John Gregory. http://www.users.uswest.net/~bayd/DescendantsofJohnGregory.htm d) Our GREGORY Line. http://www.afn.org/~afn09444/genealog/gregory.html f) Darrin and Andrea Lythgoe's Genealogy Pages. http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=william+gregory+dorothy+parre&fr=yfp-t-501&toggle=1&cop=mss&ei=UTF-8&vc=&fp_ip=DE. g) Ancestors of President Gordon Bitner Hinckley. David Kipp Conover. 9068 Crystal Vista Lane, West Jordan, Utah 84088. http://216.109.125.130/search/cache?ei=UTF-8&p=william+gregory+dorothy+%2Bparre&fr=yfp-t-501&fp_ip=DE&u=www.conovergenealogy.com/Pages/hinckley.htm&w=william+gregory+dorothy+parre&d=ZwVwJ-rnOqPU&icp=1&.intl=us. h) The Family and Ancestors of Fred Norman Randall. http://frednrandall.com/ i) Ancestors of Roderic Alan Davis. Xe Marie Sands Memorial Home Page. http://familytreemaker.genealogy.com/users/d/a/v/Roderic-A-Davis-2nd/GENE1-0019.html j) Ancestors of Samuel Runnels Harrell. http://familytreemaker.genealogy.com/users/h/a/r/Mary-Harrell/GENE5-0023.html k) The Ancestry and (very) Extended Family of Sonje Ruth Odegard. http://homepage.mac.com/codegard/family/fiches/fiche248.html l) Parre Family Tree. http://www.angelfire.com/mi2/luskfamily/L092VenablesFamily/parreinfoL92.html m) The Ancestors of Charles Augustus Richardson and Emma Curtis Rand. Shirley York Anderson. research.http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~syafam/richardson14.htm n) British History Online. http://www.british-history.ac.uk/report.asp?compid=51431. o) GEN-MEDIEVAL-L Archives. RootsWeb.com. Nan Runde research. http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/read/GEN-MEDIEVAL/2000-03/0952218083.
- [S4]. Parre Family Tree. http://www.angelfire.com/mi2/luskfamily/L092VenablesFamily/parreinfoL92.html.
- [S5]. Parr Family 1320 – 1635. RootsWeb.com. http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~dav4is/ODTs/PARR.shtml
- [S61]. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. QUOTES as sources: a) Dictionary of National Biography - from an article published in 1895
- [S7]. Katharine Parr. http://englishhistory.net/tudor/monarchs/parr.html
- [S8]. The Peerage. http://www.thepeerage.com/p335.htm#i3348
- [S9]. Townships: Kearsley', A History of the County of Lancaster: Volume 5 (1911), pp. 39-41. URL: http://www.british-history.ac.uk/report.asp?compid=52996. Date accessed: 07 June 2007.
- [S10]. Townships: Pemberton', A History of the County of Lancaster: Volume 4 (1911), pp. 78-83. URL: http://www.british-history.ac.uk/report.asp?compid=41381. Date accessed: 07 June 2007.
- [S11]. Timperley Manor Families. http://www.timperley.org/history/HIS0003.HTM
- [S12]. JDA's Ancestors; Generations 1 – 22. abpedigree.com/jahn1.htm
- [S13]. Windle Abbey. www.sthelens-heritage.org.uk/index.php/Windle
- [S14]. Lancashire Fines: Henry VII, Final Concords for Lancashire, Part 3: 1377-1509 (1905), pp. 141-71. Roll no. 95, m. 2d. URL: http://www.british-history.ac.uk/report.asp?compid=52572. Date accessed: 07 June 2007.
- [S15]. Townships: Parr, A History of the County of Lancaster: Volume 3 (1907), pp. 377-82. URL: http://www.british-history.ac.uk/report.asp?compid=41350&strquery=parr. Date accessed: 08 June 2007.
- [S16]. Townships: Lowton', A History of the County of Lancaster: Volume 4 (1911), pp. 150-54. URL: http://www.british-history.ac.uk/report.asp?compid=41398&strquery=parr. Date accessed: 08 June 2007.
- [S17]. PARR, Our Genealogy Pages. Audrey-Southern Breezes & Dreams. http://www.geocities.com/auparro/parr.html
- [S18]. Parr Family Genealogy Forum. Genealogy.com. http://genforum.genealogy.com/parr/
- [S19]. THE NAME AND FAMILY OF PARR, compiled by THE MEDIA RESEARCH BUREAU, Washington, D.C. http://www.eparrs.com/ProudParr/pages/media.htm
- [S20]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE CUMBERLAND & WESTMORLAND ANTIQUARIAN & ARCHÆOLOGICAL SOCIETY (FOUNDED 1866). VOLUME LXXXI. EDITORS J.CHARLTON, M.V.O., M.A., F.S.A. and J. HUGHES, F.S.A. PRINTED BY TITUS WILSON & SON, LTD., KENDAL, 1981. http://www.eparrs.com/ProudParr/pages/vollxxxi_.htm
- [S21]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE CUMBERLAND & WESTMORLAND ANTIQUARIAN & ARCHÆOLOGICAL SOCIETY (FOUNDED 1866). VOLUME LVI — NEW SERIES. EDITORS: ERIC BIRLEY, F.S.A., C. M. L. BOUCH, F.S.A., C. ROY HUDLESTON, F.S.A. KENDAL:PRINTED BY TITUS WILSON & SON, LTD., HIGHGATE. 1957. http://www.eparrs.com/ProudParr/pages/vol__lvi.htm
- [S22]. Newspaper Clipping: Is Your Name Parr? St. Helens Reporter Newspaper July 30, 1966 edition. http://www.eparrs.com/ProudParr/pages/clipping.htm
- [S23]. DICTIONARY OF NATIONAL BIOGRAPHY. EDITED BY SIDNEY LEE. VOL. XV. OWENS—POCKRICH. LONDON:SMITH, ELDER, & CO., 15 WATERLOO PLACE. 1909. http://www.eparrs.com/ProudParr/pages/nat_biog.htm
- [S24]. The Ancestors of Charles Augustus Richardson and Emma Curtis Rand. Shirley York Anderson research. http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~syafam/richardson14.htm
- [S25]. Mike & Joyce's Kin Data Page. WebGed. http://webpages.charter.net/jadetree/JOYCEKIN.wbg/wgj48.html
- [S26]. The District of Huyton, Liverpool in the County of Lancashire. Marriages at St Michael in the District of Huyton, Liverpool. Marriages recorded in the Register for the years 1587 - 1726. http://lan-opc.org.uk/Liverpool/Huyton/stmichael/marriages_1587-1726.html
- [S27]. Descendants of Venables. Steven Richard LUSK research. http://www.angelfire.com/mi2/luskfamily/L092VenablesFamily/VenablesFamilyL92.html#Richard_Parre:Emma%20de%20Hulton
*~*~*~*
*~*~*~*~*~*
[S19].
Other early records of the family in Virginia include those of Margery Parr, who was living in Charles City County in 1636; those of Margaret Parr, of Charles City County in 1637; those of Edward Parr of York County in 1649; those of Thomas Parr of York County in 1651; those of Mary Parr of Lancaster County in 1653; and possibly Anthony "Parrs" of Gloucester County in 1653. Any or all these may have been related to the before-mentioned immigrant Robert [F202] but the exact relationship is not in evidence.
In early New England, records are found the names of Abel Parr who was living in Boston, Mass. before 1641 and became a "freeman" in that year; Samuel Parr who was living at Salem, Mass. in 1665; and James Parr who was a member of the Massachusetts militia at a slightly later date. The records of these families are, however, only fragmentary.
About 1750 one William Parr, a tailor from London to America and settled at Williamsburg, VA. Possibly it was this William Parr who is listed among the Essex County, Virginia Presbyterians in 1758, but his family records were not in evidence.
Among the numerous descendants of the early Virginia families who served in the Revolutionary War was James Parr who died in 1821 leaving issue of Bolling, Mary, Williamson, Elizabeth and James of Greensville County.
Another who served with the Virginia Revolutionary forces was Jonathan Parr whose son, Moses Parr, made his home in Richmond, Virginia and later moved to Tennessee. Moses married Mary Terrell by whom he was the father of Thomas Jefferson and Elizabeth Parr. From this line were descended the Tennessee and Texas families of the name.
Many of the Parrs have come to America in comparatively recent years. These include Joseph Parr who was one of the survivors of the Battle of Waterloo, having served under Napoleon Bonaparte. He immigrated in 1820 to Kentucky and settled in Kenton County. By his wife Mary, he was the father of Captain Daniel G. Parr of Louisville, Kentucky.
Of high intellect and often of a scholarly turn of mine, the Parrs in America have been particularly outstanding as scientists, authors, and educators and a natural shrewdness, coupled with considerable executive ability have made some members of the family successful in the fields of business enterprise.
Besides the Parrs already mentioned, the Virginia Revolutionary forces included George, John, Thomas and William Parr. And among the others of the name who served the Colonies in their fight for freedom were Jacob, Joseph, Philip or Phillip Jacob, William, Zephaniah, and Major James Parr of Pennsylvania; Benjamin, Jesse, John, Mathias and Thomas Parr of New Jersey; and Henry Parr of Massachusetts or Rhode Island. Henry, John, Thomas, William, Richard, Samuel, Robert, Joseph and Jacob are some of the Christian names most often used by the family for its male progeny.
Of the members of the family who have been prominent in America in comparatively recent years, the following are considered representative:
* George Parr (19th century) of New York, chemist and author.
* Henry A. Parr (latter 19th and early 20th centuries) of Maryland; merchant, banker and business president.
* Louisa Taylor Parr (d. 1903) of New York, novelist.
* Samuel Wilson Parr (1857-1931) of Illinois; chemist, author and educator
* Margaret Sands Parr (b. 1858) of Mass.; author and compiler.
* Walter Rovinson Parr (b. 1871) of Mass.; writer.
* Henry Lakin Parr (1872-1931) of South Carolina; business man.